What is the Tangential Hall Effect in Ferromagnetic Materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cataldo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of tangential magnetic fields in ferromagnetic materials under longitudinal magnetic fields. It is established that if there are no surface currents at the boundary, the tangential components of the magnetic field (Ht1 and Ht2) are continuous, thus Ht1 equals Ht2. In cases where oscillating fields are present, the relationship becomes more complex. The presence of surface currents alters this continuity, linking the difference in tangential components to the surface current density. Overall, boundary conditions play a crucial role in determining the behavior of the magnetic fields.
cataldo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody.. I have a question on tagential magnetic field.
I have a ferromagnetic material in longitudinal magnetic field and i necessary to know the component tangential H (magnetizing force) of this field by probe hall effect in this material near at your inside surfice. If the probe hall value of Ht1 in air is correct to say Ht1 = Ht2 ? And if true what mathematical law is applied?
Tanks and best regards
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
IF the H (and B) field is along z, and there is no surface current J at the boundary (in x-z plane or y-z plane) , then curl H = 0, so dHz/dx = -dHz/dy = 0.
In your picture, Bz inside ferrite = u Bz outside ferrite, where u = relative permeability..
 
Last edited:
If H is a static field, then H tangential is continuous, so you are right to say Ht1=Ht2.
If H is oscillating in time, it is more complicated.
 
Tanks.. Exuse me if i do not draw the cartesian axial. Hence Ht1 = Ht2 along x-axsis and y-axsis.
If instead surface current J because the ferromagetic material is trought by current is not true Ht1 = Ht2 but I can say che H1 about Ht2?
tanks
 
Yay, boundary conditions!

Take a look starting at page 57: http://www.amanogawa.com/archive/docs/EM5.pdf

Basically, for almost any real material the tangential magnetic field is continuous. If you have surface currents, then the difference in the tangential components will be related to the surface current density.
 
Tanks for your replay... and exuse me if i do not write a english correct...
Best regard
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top