What is the tension in the rope used to pull two blocks with friction?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The tension in the rope used to pull two blocks with friction can be calculated using the formula T = 2(m_a m_b)/(m_a + m_b)A + f, where m_a and m_b are the masses of the blocks, A is the acceleration of the pulley, and f is the friction force between the blocks. The friction is kinetic due to the relative motion between the blocks, and the acceleration of the pulley must be incorporated into the equations governing the system. The relationship between the accelerations of the blocks and the pulley is derived from the constant length of the rope.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Kinematic equations for acceleration
  • Understanding of static and kinetic friction
  • Basic principles of pulley systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of tension in pulley systems with multiple masses
  • Learn about the differences between static and kinetic friction
  • Explore advanced applications of Newton's laws in dynamic systems
  • Investigate the effects of varying friction coefficients on tension calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of pulley systems and frictional forces.

capandbells
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Mass Ma lies on top of mass Mb, as shown. Assume Mb > Ma. The two blocks are pulled from rest by a massless rope passing over a pulley. The pulley is accelerated at rate A. Block Mb slides on the table without friction, but there is a constant friction force f between Ma and Mb due to their relative motion. Find the tension in the rope.
fvilS8J.png


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Newton's second law in the y direction for both masses:
N_1 - M_a g = 0
N_2 - N_1 - M_b g = 0
In the x-direction:
T_a - F_a = M_a a_a
T_b + F_a = M_b a_b
where
F_a = \mu M_a g

Ok, so I suppose we can assume the tension in the rope is the same at every point since it's massless. So T_a = T_b = T. Now, the thing is, friction can't cause the blocks to move, it can only oppose motion. So maybe the friction here has to be static friction and we assume the blocks are not moving relative to each other? Otherwise, one of the blocks would have to be moving opposite the direction in which we apply the force, which seems wrong. I'm really not sure where to go with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are doing alright . In the question it is given that there is relative motion between the blocks , so the friction between the blocks is kinetic in nature . You just take it as 'f' . No need to introduce coefficient of friction.

Apart from the equations you have formed you need one more relation i.e between the acceleration of pulley and the acceleration of the blocks .
 
I guess that is the part that I am having the most difficulty with. I don't see any way to incorporate the acceleration applied to the pulley. The only thing I can think of is that accelerating the pulley to the right is the same as subjecting the pulley to a gravitational acceleration to the left and holding it in place. Then we could say that the blocks experience a fictitious "force" to the left from this acceleration. But other than that I am stumped.
 
Look at the picture I have attached .

Let a,b,c be the coordinates of the lower block ,upper block and the pulley respectively.Express the length of the rope in terms of a,b,c .Then use the fact that rope length remains constant . This will give you the relationship between the acceleration of the three entities .
 

Attachments

  • rope.PNG
    rope.PNG
    612 bytes · Views: 1,939
Last edited:
Oh... ok. So L = (c - a) + (c - b) and differentiating twice, 2A = a_a + a_b. Solving for T we get T = 2 \frac{m_a m_b}{m_a + m_b}A + f
 
capandbells said:
Oh... ok. So L = (c - a) + (c - b) and differentiating twice, 2A = a_a + a_b

Correct .

capandbells said:
Solving for T we get T = 2 \frac{m_a m_b}{m_a + m_b}A + f

This doesn't look right .Please recheck.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ranjhahah
capandbells said:
Solving for T we get T = 2 \frac{m_a m_b}{m_a + m_b}A + f
I think you got a sign wrong on one of the f terms. Note that in your original equations F was +ve in one and -ve in the other, while T had the same sign in both.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
866
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K