What is the tension in the rope used to pull two blocks with friction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks, Ma and Mb, where Ma is on top of Mb. The blocks are being pulled by a massless rope over a pulley that is accelerating. There is friction between the two blocks, and the task is to find the tension in the rope while considering the effects of this friction and the acceleration of the pulley.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss applying Newton's second law to both blocks and consider the nature of the friction involved. There is uncertainty about whether to treat the friction as static or kinetic due to the relative motion of the blocks.
  • Some participants express difficulty in incorporating the acceleration of the pulley into their equations and explore the idea of fictitious forces as a potential approach.
  • One participant suggests expressing the length of the rope in terms of the positions of the blocks and the pulley to derive a relationship between their accelerations.

Discussion Status

There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, with some participants providing guidance on how to relate the accelerations of the blocks and the pulley. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final expression for the tension in the rope.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves a constant friction force between the blocks and that the blocks are not moving relative to each other, which raises questions about the nature of the friction involved. There is also mention of the need for additional relationships to fully solve the problem.

capandbells
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Mass Ma lies on top of mass Mb, as shown. Assume Mb > Ma. The two blocks are pulled from rest by a massless rope passing over a pulley. The pulley is accelerated at rate A. Block Mb slides on the table without friction, but there is a constant friction force f between Ma and Mb due to their relative motion. Find the tension in the rope.
fvilS8J.png


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Newton's second law in the y direction for both masses:
N_1 - M_a g = 0
N_2 - N_1 - M_b g = 0
In the x-direction:
T_a - F_a = M_a a_a
T_b + F_a = M_b a_b
where
F_a = \mu M_a g

Ok, so I suppose we can assume the tension in the rope is the same at every point since it's massless. So T_a = T_b = T. Now, the thing is, friction can't cause the blocks to move, it can only oppose motion. So maybe the friction here has to be static friction and we assume the blocks are not moving relative to each other? Otherwise, one of the blocks would have to be moving opposite the direction in which we apply the force, which seems wrong. I'm really not sure where to go with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are doing alright . In the question it is given that there is relative motion between the blocks , so the friction between the blocks is kinetic in nature . You just take it as 'f' . No need to introduce coefficient of friction.

Apart from the equations you have formed you need one more relation i.e between the acceleration of pulley and the acceleration of the blocks .
 
I guess that is the part that I am having the most difficulty with. I don't see any way to incorporate the acceleration applied to the pulley. The only thing I can think of is that accelerating the pulley to the right is the same as subjecting the pulley to a gravitational acceleration to the left and holding it in place. Then we could say that the blocks experience a fictitious "force" to the left from this acceleration. But other than that I am stumped.
 
Look at the picture I have attached .

Let a,b,c be the coordinates of the lower block ,upper block and the pulley respectively.Express the length of the rope in terms of a,b,c .Then use the fact that rope length remains constant . This will give you the relationship between the acceleration of the three entities .
 

Attachments

  • rope.PNG
    rope.PNG
    612 bytes · Views: 1,949
Last edited:
Oh... ok. So L = (c - a) + (c - b) and differentiating twice, 2A = a_a + a_b. Solving for T we get T = 2 \frac{m_a m_b}{m_a + m_b}A + f
 
capandbells said:
Oh... ok. So L = (c - a) + (c - b) and differentiating twice, 2A = a_a + a_b

Correct .

capandbells said:
Solving for T we get T = 2 \frac{m_a m_b}{m_a + m_b}A + f

This doesn't look right .Please recheck.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ranjhahah
capandbells said:
Solving for T we get T = 2 \frac{m_a m_b}{m_a + m_b}A + f
I think you got a sign wrong on one of the f terms. Note that in your original equations F was +ve in one and -ve in the other, while T had the same sign in both.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K