What is the true essence of the universe beyond human perception?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tommahawk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The essence of the universe extends beyond human perception, encompassing all matter, energy, space, and time, along with the laws that govern them. The discussion emphasizes that existence is independent of human awareness or belief, challenging the notion that perception defines reality. It argues that the universe includes everything that exists, regardless of human knowledge. This perspective suggests a definition of the universe that does not rely on scientific understanding. Ultimately, the universe is a comprehensive entity that exists beyond our sensory experiences.
Tommahawk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My one sentence take is

The character, properties, behaviour, receptiveness of aspects of the universe interact and react to produce the process of the functional system that is our universe and as it is.

How would you summarize the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Courtesy of Wikipedia:

The Universe comprises everything we perceive to physically exist, the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter and energy, and the physical laws and constants that govern them.
 
"everything we perceive to physically exist." The word "perceive" doesn't belong there. Whether or not we perceive something is irrelevant. The existence of things is independent of what anyone senses, knows or believes. The universe is everything that exists everywhere, whether or not anyone knows about them.
 
mikelepore said:
"everything we perceive to physically exist." The word "perceive" doesn't belong there. Whether or not we perceive something is irrelevant. The existence of things is independent of what anyone senses, knows or believes. The universe is everything that exists everywhere, whether or not anyone knows about them.

So this would be the definition that does not require Science necessarily?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top