High School What is the true way to determine time parameters from semilog graph?

Click For Summary
To determine T2 parameters from a semilog graph of nuclear magnetic resonance data, two fitting methods are discussed: fitting each part of the data separately versus extrapolating values from the second part to fit the first. The accuracy of the calculated T2 values depends on the quality of the fit and the sensitivity of parameters to noise. It is emphasized that there is no definitive "true" method for fitting, and the choice may depend on the distinctness of T1 and T2. Utilizing software like Kaleidagraph or Excel can facilitate the least squares fitting process. Ultimately, the effectiveness of each approach should be evaluated based on the fit quality.
Leonid92
Messages
45
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
What is the true way to determine time parameters T2 from semilog graph?
Hi all,
I have experimental nuclear magnetic resonance data that describe T2-relaxation of the nuclei in the sample of interest. The experimental points obey bi-exponential dependence: I = I1*exp(-t/T2_1) + I2*exp(-t/T2_2), where I is current intensity, I1 and I2 are intensities which represent fractions of two T2 components - T2_1 and T2_2. The purpose is to calculate T2_1 and T2_2. To calculate T2_1 and T2_2, I fit bi-exponential equation mentioned above to experimental data points. But in order to ensure that calculated T2 values are true, I'd like to build semilog graph. For this, I take natural logarithm of experimental intensities, and thus the vertical axis in the graph is now in ln(I). Then, in obtained semilog graph, I need to divide points into two parts: first part of points will be fitted by linear equation y1 = C1 - t/T2_1, and the second part of points will be fitted by linear equation y2 = C2 - t/T2_2. And here I have two variants of how to do this fitting. The first variant is just to fit each part of data points with linear equation with corresponding initial guesses. And the second variant is the following: first, I fit the second part of points with equation y2 = C2 - t/T2_2, i.e. 7 points as you can see in the attached images. Thus I found C2 and T2_2 from fit. Then, using equation y2 = C2 - t/T2_2, I find ln(I) values for time values corresponding to the first part of points (i.e. first 3 points as you can see in the attached images). After that, I subtract these extrapolated ln(I) values from first three experimental ln(I) values. Let's call these new values as ln(I)1, ln(I)2, ln(I)3. Finally, I fit these 3 points with equation y1 = C1 - t/T2_1 and find the parameters C1 and T2_1. Could you please tell me, which variant of calculating T2 values is true? Please find attached two images which show the difference between two mentioned methods of calculating T2 values.
 

Attachments

  • Graph1.png
    Graph1.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 383
  • Graph2.png
    Graph2.png
    2 KB · Views: 400
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no “true” or “false” way to fit a curve. You just need to check how good the fit is and how sensitive your parameters are to the noise.
 
I don't think this can be done easily using a graph unless T1 and T2 are very different. Otherwise, I would use a least squares fit to the presumed functionality. There are tons of easy-to-use software available to do this, such as Kaleidagraph and Excel.
 
  • Like
Likes Leonid92
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K