What is the validity of half lives being constant in all radioactive isotopes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hunt_mat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
hunt_mat
Homework Helper
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
33
Hi,

I has talking to someone aboutthe half lives of certain radioactive isotopes not be constant. He cited this paper:
Chih-An Huh, “Dependence of the Decay Rate of 7Be on Chemical Forms,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 171(1999):325-328

And it seems that they can change, and quite considerably, to within around 1% or so. So my question is, would this be valid for all radioactive isotopes or just certain ones?

Mat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isotopes that decay by electron capture can have their half-lives changed by modifying the electronic configuration. In the extreme case, if you fully ionize a nucleus that decays by capturing an electron, it won't be able to decay.
 
To add, Re-187 is unstable against beta decay. Fully ionized Re-187 is stable: the electrons shift the beta energy by about 20 eV, but since the energy is very low (3 eV or so), it moves it from above threshold to below threshold.
 
Interesting. I thought that radioactivity was caused by instability of the nucleus and therefore was based upon probability for the decay.

So if some elements decay via electron capture they're probably not a good one to date things with?

Thanks for the information by the way.
 
The environmental changes are normally miniscule, so it doesn't matter. Electron capture works just fine in K-Ar dating.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top