What is the Validity of the Rate Equation in Different Reactor Types?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The validity of the rate equation in different reactor types, specifically batch reactors, plug flow reactors (PFR), and continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTR), is a central topic of discussion. The general rate equation, defined as ##(-r_a)=-1/V\frac{dNa}{dt}##, is applicable primarily to batch reactors. In PFRs, the rate is expressed as ##(-r_a)=-\frac{dFa}{dV}##, indicating that the concentration changes with cumulative residence time rather than time. The discussion concludes that equating the rate equations across different reactor types is inappropriate due to the distinct operational characteristics of each reactor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical reaction engineering principles
  • Familiarity with batch reactor dynamics
  • Knowledge of plug flow reactor (PFR) and continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) operations
  • Basic calculus for interpreting rate equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between batch reactor and PFR dynamics
  • Learn about the implications of residence time in reactor design
  • Explore the derivation and application of the rate equation in CSTRs
  • Investigate the concept of steady-state operation in chemical reactors
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineers, process engineers, and students studying reaction kinetics and reactor design will benefit from this discussion.

Rahulx084
Messages
99
Reaction score
1
What is the definition of rate ##(-r_a)=-\frac{dCa}{dt}## or ##(-r_a)=-1/V\frac{dNa}{dt}## ? I think the general one is the second one and first one is for constant volume reaction system. Is the above written rate equation only valid to batch reactor? If not can we use this in a PFR or MFR? In PFR we know the rate comes out to be ##(-r_a)=-\frac{dFa}{dV}## ,can we equate ##-1/V\frac{dNa}{dt} = -\frac{dFa}{dV}## ? If not then why? Is the rate equation not valid everywhere?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are aware that, in a PFR reactor, the reactor is assumed to operate at steady state so the temperature at any fixed location in the reactor is not changing with time, correct? It is changing with spatial position (cumulative volume V) through the reactor. And, if we define V/Q as the cumulative residence time from the inlet to cumulative volume V (i.e., ##t_r##), then $$\frac{dF_a}{dV}=Q\frac{dC_a}{dV}=r_a$$or$$\frac{dC_a}{dt_r}=r_a$$ So the concentration varies with the cumulative residence time in the PFR in exactly the same way it varies with the clock time for a batch reactor.
 
okay, so does that mean we can't equate ##-dCa/dt##=##\frac{Ca_o-Ca}{t_m}## (equating design equation of cstr with rate equation), we can't do the above thing right?As here the concentration isn't dropping gradually instead its sudden drop and also there is uniformity in the cstr
 
Rahulx084 said:
okay, so does that mean we can't equate ##-dCa/dt##=##\frac{Ca_o-Ca}{t_m}## (equating design equation of cstr with rate equation), we can't do the above thing right?As here the concentration isn't dropping gradually instead its sudden drop and also there is uniformity in the cstr
Yes. The equation should really read: $$\frac{(C_a-C_{a0})}{t_m}=r_a|_{C_a}$$
I've never liked the idea of writing ##dC_a/dt=r_a## because it only applies to batch reactors.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Okay great , Thank you so much :)
 
I need to anneal 5052 aluminum for a home project. Google has given me mixed results on how to do this. Short version is that I'm doing some heavy forming on a piece of 5052-H32 and I'm running into issues with it work hardening. I've tried the Sharpie trick with a propane torch. But I'm not sure this is doing anything. I'm also seeing conflicting opinions whether to quench or air cool. So I'm looking for some expert opinions. (Oven heating is not an option due to size.) Thanks. edit: The...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
40K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K