What is the value of 1 monolayer in nanometers?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yzou_ua
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Means
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The value of 1 monolayer (ML) is not a universal constant; it varies based on the material and crystal structure being deposited. For example, in the case of InAs quantum dots, a height of "5nm-height 2.5ML" indicates that the structure consists of two complete layers and one half-filled layer, with the exact thickness influenced by factors such as surface termination. The use of monolayers simplifies the measurement process during film growth, particularly when utilizing techniques like Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED) oscillations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of crystal structures and their significance in material science
  • Familiarity with monolayer deposition techniques
  • Knowledge of Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED) and its application in film growth
  • Basic concepts of quantum dots and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the crystal structures of common materials like Al2O3 and TiN
  • Learn about the principles of Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED)
  • Explore numerical modeling techniques for simulating quantum dot behavior
  • Investigate the impact of surface termination on material properties
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in material science, physicists studying quantum dots, and engineers involved in thin-film deposition techniques will benefit from this discussion.

yzou_ua
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Always be used in experiments... but when it appears in literature, most authors never tell the exact value of 1 ML (monolayer).

So, what is the value, generally??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yzou_ua said:
Always be used in experiments... but when it appears in literature, most authors never tell the exact value of 1 ML (monolayer).

So, what is the value, generally??

This is not a universal value. It depends on the material and crystal structure of what is being deposited.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
This is not a universal value. It depends on the material and crystal structure of what is being deposited.

Zz.


So w/o telling from author, we can never know it??
 
yzou_ua said:
So w/o telling from author, we can never know it??

Unless you know the crystal structure. If the author usually doesn't say, then it's a "common" material that he/she would assume that everyone knows already. This is often the case for, say, high-Tc superconductors or well-known compounds such as Al2O3 or TiN.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Unless you know the crystal structure. If the author usually doesn't say, then it's a "common" material that he/she would assume that everyone knows already. This is often the case for, say, high-Tc superconductors or well-known compounds such as Al2O3 or TiN.

Zz.

Then, let's say a particular example in a paper - "5nm-height 2.5ML InAs quantum dots", what does it mean?
Should the height of QD be equal to "2*lattice constant of InAs (~6Å)" ? Isn't it ??
 
2 monolayers will probably be of that order of magnitude, yes. But the exact value will depend on e.g. the termination of the surface etc.
Also, 2.5ML would mean 2 complette layers and one half-filled layer; meaning the top-most layer does not cover the whole surface. Again, what it looks really like will depend on the materials etc.

Btw, the reason the thickness is given in monolayers is because it is much easier to "count" the number of layers (using RHEED oscillations) during the film growth than it is to actually measure the thickness of the film.
 
f95toli said:
2 monolayers will probably be of that order of magnitude, yes. But the exact value will depend on e.g. the termination of the surface etc.
Also, 2.5ML would mean 2 complette layers and one half-filled layer; meaning the top-most layer does not cover the whole surface. Again, what it looks really like will depend on the materials etc.

Btw, the reason the thickness is given in monolayers is because it is much easier to "count" the number of layers (using RHEED oscillations) during the film growth than it is to actually measure the thickness of the film.

Thx a lot for ur patience & excellent background...
Actually, what i want to do is using my numerical model to simulate the experiment. That's why i need to know the exact length, height, etc.
So, i should use "5 nm" in above example to simulate the QD. Right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K