MHB What is the Value of f(2009) in the Given Recursive Sequence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The recursive sequence defined by f(n+3) = (f(n) - 1) / (f(n) + 1) with f(5) = 10 exhibits periodic behavior with a period of 4. The sequence can be expressed as a0 = 10, a1 = 9/11, a2 = -1/10, and a3 = -11/9. Since 668 is divisible by 4, the value of f(2009) corresponds to f(5), which is 10. Thus, the value of f(2009) is 10. The periodic nature of the sequence simplifies the calculation significantly.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$f(5)=10$

$f(n+3)=\dfrac {f(n)-1}{f(n)+1},\,\, for \,\, all \,\,n\in N$

find f(2009)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: find number of a sequence

Albert said:
$f(5)=10$

$f(n+3)=\dfrac {f(n)-1}{f(n)+1},\,\, for \,\, all \,\,n\in N$

find f(2009)
because of periodicity: f(5)=10, f(8)=9/11, f(11)=-1/10, f(14)=-11/9; f(17)=10, ...

f(2009)=10

.
 
Re: find number of a sequence

Albert said:
$f(5)=10$

$f(n+3)=\dfrac {f(n)-1}{f(n)+1},\,\, for \,\, all \,\,n\in N$

find f(2009)

An equivalent and more simple statement of the problem is: given the difference equation...

$$ a_{n+1}= \frac{a_{n}-1}{a_{n}+1}\ ,\ a_{0}=10\ (1)$$

... find $a_{668}$...

Before trying a 'direct attack' to the non linear d.e. (1) it is better to search that (1) has some periodic solution, i.e. a solution where $a_{n+k}=a_{n}$. Let's set $a_{n+k}=y$ and $a_{n}=x$. We start with k=1 we obtain ...

$$y= \frac{x-1}{x+1}\ (2)$$

... and imposing y=x we arrive to the equation...

$$ x^{2}+1=0\ (3)$$

... which has no real solutions. Setting k=2 we arrive to the [surprisingly simple...] equation...

$$y = - \frac{1}{x}\ (4)$$

... that pratically solves the problem. The (4) indeed indicates that the solution has periodicity 4 and, given $a_{0}$, we have...

$$a_{0}\ ,\ \frac{a_{0}-1}{a_{0}+1}\ ,\ - \frac{1}{a_{0}}\ ,\ -\frac {a_{0}+1}{a_{0}-1}\ , \ a_{0}\ ,\ ...\ (5)$$

In our case is $a_{0}=10$ so that the other terms are $a_{1}= \frac{9}{11}$, $a_{2}= - \frac{1}{10}$, and $a_{3}= - \frac{11}{9}$ . Now 668 is divisible by 4 so that is $a_{668}=a_{0}=10$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top