What is the velocity of light in glass based on refraction angles?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of light in glass based on the angles of incidence and refraction. The original poster presents a scenario where a light ray enters glass at a specific angle and measures the refraction angle, leading to confusion regarding the application of relevant equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use two different methods involving equations related to the sine of angles and the speed of light to find the velocity in glass. They express confusion over the discrepancies in their results and question the validity of their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring the implications of using the speed of light in air versus vacuum and how that affects their calculations. There is a recognition of potential errors in the assumptions regarding the angles of incidence and refraction, and one participant suggests that the original poster may have reversed these angles.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment that the speed of light in air is not exactly the same as in vacuum, which may contribute to the discrepancies in the calculations. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly identifying the angles involved in the refraction process.

The_Lobster
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A light ray enters a piece of glass at the angle a1 = 10 degrees. We measure it's refraction angle a2 = 15 degrees. With this information we find the velocity of the light ray in the glass.

Homework Equations


1. (sin a1 / c1) = (sin a2 / c2)

2. n-glass = (sin a1 x n-air) / sin a2

3. c-glass = (c-vacuum / n-glass)

The Attempt at a Solution


I get confused when trying to calculate the velocity of the light, and here's why:

If I take the first equation into account, I get c2 = (c1 x sin a2) / sin a1 --> (3E8 x sin 15) / sin 10 which equals: 447143843.2 m/s.

If I use the second and third equations instead, I combine these two and find the velocity of the light in the glass: 3E8 / ( (sin 10 x 1,003) / sin 15) which makes: 445806424 m/s.

Which one of these are correct? I would think the latter method. But why is the first method wrong? When we assume that light has wavelike behaviour?

:confused:

Cheers,
Joachim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I might have understood it myself! Since light velocity in air and vacuum is *almost* the same, but not quite, that's my source of error in these equations? When I used the first equation i used 3E8 m/s as light speed in air, but the light speed in air is really 3E8 x 1,003 (which I have used in the latter equations). That is, if I multiply 3E8 by 1,003 in the first equation, I get a lot closer to the answer with the second equation. They're still not quite the same, but now it might be just due to rounding?
 
The_Lobster said:
A light ray enters a piece of glass at the angle a1 = 10 degrees. We measure it's refraction angle a2 = 15 degrees.
I think you have these angles reversed. Since the index of refraction of glass is greater than that of air, the angle of refraction will be less than the angle of incidence.
If I take the first equation into account, I get c2 = (c1 x sin a2) / sin a1
This seems correct.
If I use the second and third equations instead, I combine these two and find the velocity of the light in the glass:
Realize that combining the 2nd and 3rd equations is equivalent to the first: If you get a different answer, check your algebra.
 
Thank you!

Yes, I just reviewed what I had written in my first post: "A light ray enters a piece of glass ", it's supposed to be "A light ray exits a piece of glass ", that makes more sense with my variables=)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K