What is the velocity of the opposing rod in a hexagon mechanics problem?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StatusX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hexagon Mechanics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving a system of six rods arranged in a regular hexagon, focusing on the effects of applying a force to one rod and determining the resulting velocity of the opposing rod. The conversation explores concepts related to mechanics, geometry, and dynamics, with participants seeking to clarify the relationships between the rods and the forces at play.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the mechanics problem and seeks help in determining the velocity of the opposing rod after applying a force to one rod.
  • Another participant suggests analyzing the symmetry of the hexagon to simplify the problem.
  • There is a discussion about the effects of torque and forces exerted by the rods on each other, with some uncertainty about how these forces work out.
  • Participants propose that the velocities of the front and back rods may be equal and opposite, but the implications of this are debated.
  • One participant introduces a simpler system of two horizontal rods to clarify the mechanics involved, questioning the forces at the hinge.
  • There is mention of the center of mass and its role in the system, with some participants unsure how to apply this concept given the information available.
  • Some participants express confusion about the need for additional equations and the nature of the interactions between the rods.
  • The discussion touches on the assumptions of ideal conditions, such as no friction and energy conservation, but participants question the applicability of these assumptions.
  • One participant suggests analyzing the problem with the top rod fixed to understand the motion of the side rods as the hexagon collapses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanics of the system, with no consensus reached on the specific equations or methods to solve the problem. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the interactions and the assumptions that can be made.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainty about the forces acting on each rod, the role of the center of mass, and the implications of assuming ideal conditions. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the problem, with participants unsure of the necessary equations to describe the system accurately.

  • #31
The momentum conjugate to theta is the partial of T wrt theta-dot, and since theta-dot and y-dot are both initially zero, that gives zero for the initial value of this expression.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
No, they aren't initially zero. In the problem, a push is given to the bottom rod, which makes both dy/dt and d\theta/dt non-zero, although (for some reason I don't fully understand) only makes p_y non-zero, not p_\theta.
 
  • #33
If the force is nonimpulsive, then this makes the acceleration of the bottom rod nonzero, but its initial velocity is still zero.
 
  • #34
The point of the problem is that the bottom rod is initially (ie, just after the force has been applied for some short time, providing some non-zero impulse) moving at speed v. The initial velocity of all the rods is non-zero, and the question is to find how they are related. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
 
  • #35
I worked it on through assuming that this is an impulsive force, and I concluded that the post impulse value of theta-dot is -(9*V)/(11*L) and the speed of the top bar is (2*V)/11.

I don't think those are the result you had said were the given answers, but that is what I got never the less. Have you been able to work out a better result?
 
  • #36
I did the same thing and got the initial value for theta dot to be -9v/10L, which gives the right answer. My Kinetic energy is:

T = \frac{2m L^2}{3} (1 + 6 \cos^2 \theta) \dot \theta^2 + 6 L \dot y \cos \theta \dot \theta + 3 \dot y^2

But I'm still note sure why it's a good idea to set p_\theta=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K