What is the velocity of the opposing rod in a hexagon mechanics problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StatusX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hexagon Mechanics
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving a hexagonal arrangement of rods connected by hinges. When a force is applied to one rod, the challenge is to determine the velocity of the opposing rod. Participants emphasize the importance of symmetry in analyzing the system, suggesting that the velocities of the front and back rods are equal and opposite relative to the center of mass. The conversation also touches on the complexities of calculating forces at the hinges and the potential use of Lagrangian mechanics to derive the equations of motion. Ultimately, the problem remains unsolved, with participants seeking clarity on the relationships between the rods' movements and the forces acting upon them.
  • #31
The momentum conjugate to theta is the partial of T wrt theta-dot, and since theta-dot and y-dot are both initially zero, that gives zero for the initial value of this expression.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
No, they aren't initially zero. In the problem, a push is given to the bottom rod, which makes both dy/dt and d\theta/dt non-zero, although (for some reason I don't fully understand) only makes p_y non-zero, not p_\theta.
 
  • #33
If the force is nonimpulsive, then this makes the acceleration of the bottom rod nonzero, but its initial velocity is still zero.
 
  • #34
The point of the problem is that the bottom rod is initially (ie, just after the force has been applied for some short time, providing some non-zero impulse) moving at speed v. The initial velocity of all the rods is non-zero, and the question is to find how they are related. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
 
  • #35
I worked it on through assuming that this is an impulsive force, and I concluded that the post impulse value of theta-dot is -(9*V)/(11*L) and the speed of the top bar is (2*V)/11.

I don't think those are the result you had said were the given answers, but that is what I got never the less. Have you been able to work out a better result?
 
  • #36
I did the same thing and got the initial value for theta dot to be -9v/10L, which gives the right answer. My Kinetic energy is:

T = \frac{2m L^2}{3} (1 + 6 \cos^2 \theta) \dot \theta^2 + 6 L \dot y \cos \theta \dot \theta + 3 \dot y^2

But I'm still note sure why it's a good idea to set p_\theta=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K