What is the wavelength difference based on a mini spectrom.?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the wavelength difference (Δλ) that a miniature spectrometer can resolve, specifically at a wavelength of 550 nm. The spectrometer utilizes a diffraction grating with 800 slits/mm and is positioned 25 mm from the detector. The resolution is determined using the formula Δλ = d Δθ, where d is the grating spacing (1/800 mm) and Δθ is derived from the detector's ability to distinguish two bright lines 30 μm apart. The analysis highlights the importance of understanding diffraction grating principles and the role of lens focusing in spectrometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diffraction grating principles
  • Familiarity with the formula dsin(θ) = mλ
  • Knowledge of basic trigonometry and small angle approximations
  • Experience with spectrometry and optical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of diffraction grating spectroscopy
  • Learn about the impact of focal length on spectrometer resolution
  • Explore the derivation of wavelength resolution formulas in optical systems
  • Investigate the effects of detector spacing and sensitivity on spectrometer performance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, optical engineering, and analytical chemistry who are involved in spectrometry and wavelength resolution analysis will benefit from this discussion.

ilittlepotato
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm a bit stuck on how to approach this problem.

A miniature spectrometer used for chemical analysis has a diffraction grating with 800 slits/mm set 25.0 mm in front of the detector "screen." The detector can barely distinguish two bright lines that are 30 μm apart in the first-order spectrum. What is the resolution of the spectrometer at a wavelength of 550 nm ? That is, if two distinct wavelengths can barely be distinguished, one of them being 550 nm , what is the wavelength difference Δ λ between the two?

Homework Equations


dsin(theta)=mlamda

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to find theta by using tan^-1(30micrometers/25 milimeters) but then the value came out very small so I'm not sure if I'm doing it right. I was going to use the theta to plug into dsin(theta)=mlamda, but the answer wasn't right.

I also tried to do 10^-6(sin(tan-1(30um/25mm)) and got 1.199999136 x 10^-9m as the difference, but that's also not the right approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For this one I think you need to assume the diffraction grating is a transmissive grating, and it does require a lens element immediately following it that focuses the light with a focal length of ## f=25 \, mm ##. The detector (most likely an array of very small (virtually microscopic) detectors) can measure locations accurate to ## \Delta x=30 \, um=f \Delta \theta ## tells you the ## \Delta \theta ## (in radians) that can be resolved. ##( \Delta \theta=\frac{\Delta x}{f}) ##. Primary maxima occur at ## m \lambda=d \sin(\theta) ##, so that gives the location (in angle ## \theta ##) of the spectral line of wavelength ## \lambda ##. ## \\ ## (The ## x ## location in the plane of the detector for a given wavelength ## \lambda ## is given by ## x= f \theta ##, for small angles ## \theta ##. This is the result of using a lens with focal length ## f ##. The far-field diffraction pattern, which has primary maxima given by the equation ## m \lambda=d \sin(\theta) ##, is made to occur in the near field at a distance of 25 mm away because parallel lines incident on a lens are brought to a focus in the focal plane of the lens. Parallel rays incident at angle ## \theta ## (they would be at angle ## \theta ## in the far-field if there was no lens) come to a focus at location ## x=f \theta ## in the focal plane of the lens, where the detector is located.). ## \\ ## They tell you the spectrometer is used with the first-order set of lines, so that ## m=1 ##. This means ## \lambda=d \sin(\theta) ## with ## d=(1/800) ## mm. You can take a derivative here and assume the ## \cos(\theta) ## result is approximately equal to 1. This gives ## \Delta \lambda=d \Delta \theta ##, where ## \Delta \theta ## was computed above. (To be more precise, you could use ## \Delta \lambda =d \cos(\theta) \, \Delta \theta ##, and compute ## \cos(\theta) ## given that ## \lambda=d \sin(\theta) ##, to get ## \cos(\theta) ## in terms of ## \lambda ## and ## d ##. (Remember ## \cos(\theta)=\sqrt{1-\sin^2(\theta)} ##). Otherwise the result for ## \Delta \lambda ## is independent of ## \lambda ##). ## \\ ## Note: In this homework problem, it really appears that the necessary background material was not supplied. Even the problem is very poorly stated. I have specialized in diffraction grating spectroscopy so the calculation is rather routine for me, but from what they supplied you with, it really could leave you guessing where to begin with it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
21K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K