What is this differential equation? I'm going crazy

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 3K views
SSGD
Messages
49
Reaction score
4
I have been working on a math problem and I keep getting the some type of PDEs.

x*dU/dx+y*dU/dy = 0
x*dU/dx+y*dU/dy+z*dU/dz = 0 ...

x1*dU/dx1+x2*dU/dx2+x3*dU/dx3 + ... + xn*dU/dxn= 0

dU/dxi is the partial derivative with respect to the ith variable. Does anyone know about this type of PDE? It looks like the Euler-Cauchy ODE.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In each case, we can write the differential operator as ##\vec{r}\cdot\nabla_r U##, so the operator is a directional derivative along the vector ##\vec{r}##. I'm not sure that the equation with this equal to zero has a special name, though there are equations named after both Euler and Cauchy in the theory of transport that involve a directional derivative.
 
The equations can be reduced to a linear pde with constant coefficients with the substitution.

xi = e^yi

dU/dy1+dU/dy2 + ... + dU/dyn= 0

Same substition you would use to solve Euler-Cauchy ODE.
 
You can actually do a bit more. On a patch where one coordinate does not vanish, ##x_n\neq 0##, we can show that the solutions ##U(x_i)## must only depend on the ratios ##x_i/x_n## (called homogenous or projective coordinates), i.e., ##U## is a function ##U(x_i/x_n)##.
 
Wow your right... So U(xi/xn) could be written as U(e^(y1-yn),e^(y2-yn),...,e^(yn-1-yn)).
 
The solution U(x1,x2,...,xn)=U(a*x1,a*x2,...,a*xn)

Where a is constant. So it doesn't scale. I was just making substitutions to look for properties.

... Just realized the ratio of the two variables would cancel any constant coefficients anyway ... A lot of work for the same result.

Now I need a condition to find a solution.
 
Any (first-differentiable) function of the homogenous variables is a solution. You would need additional differential equations or boundary conditions to narrow the solutions.
 
I know there has to be n-1 solutions for the solution I am looking for if they exist. So one less than the number of variables. Which I think is possible because you can rewrite the function as the ratio of one of the variables. Which makes one less than n inputs. Thanks for the help/enlightenment. I like the vector approach. I am going to write out the Fourier series for the solution, sub back in the ln(yi) for xi and see if I can find some conditions
 
SSGD said:
I have been working on a math problem and I keep getting the some type of PDEs.

x*dU/dx+y*dU/dy = 0
x*dU/dx+y*dU/dy+z*dU/dz = 0 ...

x1*dU/dx1+x2*dU/dx2+x3*dU/dx3 + ... + xn*dU/dxn= 0

dU/dxi is the partial derivative with respect to the ith variable. Does anyone know about this type of PDE? It looks like the Euler-Cauchy ODE.

Those are first-order linear PDEs which can in principle be solved by the method of characteristics.

As an example, if [tex] x \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} + y\frac{\partial U}{\partial y} = 0[/tex] then you can make a change of independent variables from [itex](x,y)[/itex] to [itex](t,s)[/itex] where [itex]\frac{\partial x}{\partial t} = x[/itex], [itex]\frac{\partial y}{\partial t} = y[/itex] to obtain [tex] \frac{\partial U}{\partial t} = 0.[/tex] Thus [itex]U = f(s)[/itex] for some function [itex]f[/itex].
Now we know that [itex](x,y) = (A(s),B(s))e^t[/itex] so all we need is to choose the functions [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]B[/itex] appropriately and we can then invert the relationship to give [itex](t,s)[/itex] in terms of [itex](x,y)[/itex]. Here we can take [itex](A(s),B(s)) = (\cos s, \sin s)[/itex] which gives a problem at [itex](x,y) = (0,0)[/itex], but if you look at the PDE you see that [itex]\nabla U[/itex] is not uniquely determined at (0,0) anyway.