What is this instrument called? - Photoptics

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnintheuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Instrument
AI Thread Summary
The instrument in question is identified as a spectrometer, spectrograph, or spectroscope, specifically designed for analyzing spectral output rather than chemical analysis. It features a loose receptor that allows for spectrum analysis without being confined to a single frequency, distinguishing it from a photometer. Users have noted that many spectrographs available are geared towards laboratory chemical analysis, which complicates searches for non-chemical versions. Suggested search terms include "fiber spectrometer," "fiber-fed spectrograph," or "OEM spectrograph" to refine results. This discussion highlights the need for precise terminology to find the appropriate instrument for specific applications.
johnintheuk
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
It's a spectrograph but not used for chemical analysis in the lab, the receptor is loose and can be used for analyzing the spectral output of a source.

It's not a photometer, that's either the receiver alone or tends to work at only one frequency.

I've seen them labeled as spectrographs, but that's pulling up a whole load of bench top sample analyzers for chemists.

Loose receiver that will give me a spectrum.

Thanks for any help!
 
Science news on Phys.org
It's a spectrometer (or spectrograph or spectroscope = same thing ) something like this http://fiberopticspectrometer.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm looking at some labeled as spectrographs as well. Is there any terminology I can use to bias my searches towards the none chemistry version?

I guess the majority of them use fibers to get the light back to the grating and diodes, so fiber spectrometer might be a good start.
 
fibre-fed or oem spectrograph ?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top