What is wrong with my derivation for the moment of inertia of a sphere?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivation for the moment of inertia of a sphere presented in the discussion incorrectly concludes with (3/5)MR². The correct moment of inertia for a solid sphere is (2/5)MR², while the moment of inertia for a thin spherical shell is (2/3)MR². The error in the derivation arises from using the incorrect factor in the equation for the moment of inertia of a shell, specifically failing to include the factor of 2/3 in the expression dI = (2/3)r² dm. This miscalculation leads to the incorrect integration result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus for integration
  • Familiarity with the concept of moment of inertia
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and volume elements
  • Experience with physical principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the moment of inertia for a solid sphere using calculus
  • Study the differences between the moment of inertia for solid objects versus hollow objects
  • Learn about the application of the parallel axis theorem in rotational dynamics
  • Explore advanced topics in rotational motion, such as angular momentum and torque
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying rotational dynamics or moment of inertia calculations.

eg2333
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I thought about a derivation for the moment of inertia, but my answer comes out to (3/5)MR^2

Basically, what I did was I considered the sphere as a sum of infinitesimally thin spherical shells.

The moment of inertia for one shell is dI=(r^2)*dm

where dm=(M/V)*4*pi*r^2*dr

where V=(4/3)*pi*R^3

so the equation dI=3*pi*M*r^4*dr when simplified.

Integrating this from 0 to R (Summing up the spherical shells from the center to the edge of the big sphere) gives me (3/5)*M*R^2. What is wrong with this derivation? :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to wikipedia, moment of inertia for a spherical shell is 2/3 M R^2 , not what you use.
 
It is actually (2/5)*MR^2 for a sphere. The method I used clearly gives the incorrect answer, which is why I'm asking to see if anyone can tell me where the fault is.
 
Nabeshin isn't talking about the sphere, but a spherical shell. As I just said in your identical thread,

"The moment of inertia of a thin shell is (2/3)MR^2, not MR^2, so your original dI should be (2/3)r^2 dm - there's your missing factor of 2/3. "
 
Mute said:
Nabeshin isn't talking about the sphere, but a spherical shell. As I just said in your identical thread,

"The moment of inertia of a thin shell is (2/3)MR^2, not MR^2, so your original dI should be (2/3)r^2 dm - there's your missing factor of 2/3. "

Thanks for spelling that out, apparently I wasn't clear enough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K