What is Zeno's paradox and can it be resolved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tenenbaum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quote
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around Zeno's paradox, which posits that one can never reach a destination because there are infinite steps to take, each halving the distance. Participants clarify that while the paradox presents a mathematical concept, it does not apply to physical reality. They emphasize that in practical terms, one can traverse finite distances, like crossing a street, despite the theoretical infinite divisions. The conversation highlights the distinction between mathematical abstraction and physical reality, asserting that infinite series can indeed be summed, allowing for actual movement toward a destination. The need for a FAQ on recurring topics like this is suggested to streamline future discussions.
Tenenbaum
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
No matter how close you ever think you are, there is always a infinite distance between.

Why is it wrong?
Why is it right?

I have no experience in physics, but I feel you guys could answer better then anyone else.


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's Zeno's paradox. It breaks down on the atomic level.
You get half-way to your girlfriend, then half of that distance, then half of the remainder, and so on. So you never actually get there... but you can get close enough for all practical purposes. :biggrin:
 
two reasons the above girl friend scenario will not apply!

Dolly Parton !
 
Ranger Mike said:
Dolly Parton !

Please don't double-post... :rolleyes:
 
... I suddenly feel the urge for experimentation ...
 
Danger said:
That's Zeno's paradox. It breaks down on the atomic level.
You get half-way to your girlfriend, then half of that distance, then half of the remainder, and so on. So you never actually get there... but you can get close enough for all practical purposes. :biggrin:

Yeah, but assuming constant speed, it also takes you half as long to go through each step, so you end up doing an infinite amount of those half-step moves in a finite amount of time.
 
I can stroll across the street because it's about twenty feet distance. That's finite. The idea that we can divide the distance infinitely (at least mathematically) has nothing to do with actually crossing the physical distance because I'm not being divided (or shrunk down) infinitely. The street isn't being divided. Nor is the sidewalk. These dimensions are set and stable.
 
This is one of many recurring topics. Perhaps there should be a FAQ for these, where the solutions and links to resources are given. Then where a moderator sees that, the OP can be directed there followed by a lock.
 
Tenenbaum said:
No matter how close you ever think you are, there is always a infinite distance between.

Why is it wrong?
Why is it right?

As this is stated, it is clearly not true. If I am 3 metres, say, from my destination, there is certainly not an infinite distance between us.
 
  • #10
Even Zeno's paradox isn't really a big deal if you understand that it defines a mathematical situation that isn't physically real.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
Even Zeno's paradox isn't really a big deal if you understand that it defines a mathematical situation that isn't physically real.

Or that infinite series can be summed.
 
Back
Top