What Makes the Most Ridiculous ATS Thread So Unbelievably Idiotic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perceived absurdity of various claims made in a thread on AboveTopSecret regarding physics concepts, particularly relating to light speed, gravity, and time travel. Participants share their reactions to these claims, highlighting logical inconsistencies and humorous misunderstandings. The scope includes conceptual misunderstandings of physics and the implications of scientific vulgarization.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants find humor in claims that traveling at light speed could allow one to become their own grandfather, questioning the logic behind such statements.
  • Others point out that misunderstandings about gravity, such as the moon having no gravity, reflect a lack of logical thinking.
  • A participant references a hoverboard thread, suggesting that absurd claims are not uncommon in online discussions about science.
  • There are mentions of the complexities of relativity, with some participants attempting to clarify concepts like time dilation while others mock the misunderstandings.
  • One participant expresses disbelief at claims of light traveling faster than its known speed, questioning the validity of such assertions.
  • Several posts comment on the perceived educational level of those making the claims, suggesting they reflect elementary school understanding of physics.
  • Some participants express concern about the implications of scientific vulgarization on public understanding of physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the absurdity of the claims discussed, but there is no consensus on the implications of these misunderstandings or the broader impact of scientific discourse in public forums.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the knowledge level of others and the nature of scientific understanding, but these assumptions are not universally held or agreed upon.

  • #61
by the way. I remember there was this website that indexed all the quacks on the internet by topic, and rated them (I think with ducks actually, though I can't remember). Like there was a section full of websites about free energy, elvis is alive, etc. I would always go on it when I was bored, anyone know the address? If you do pleeease post it! I remember it was awesome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
www.crank.dot[/URL]

- Warren
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #64
YAY! thanks! I haven't been on it in years!
 
  • #65
:smile: What a bad thread to make a typo like that, yes?

- Warren
 
  • #67
moe darklight said:
thank you moose for reviving this thread, you made my day! :smile::smile::smile:

Someone thanked me for reviving a thread... Awesome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K