What Makes the Speed of Light So Special in Physics?

km90
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am new to this forum, so forgive me if this question has already been asked. Also forgive me if this is a seemingly simple question, as I am just now starting my undergrad and am relatively new to a lot of physics topics.

I understand that it is generally considered that anything with an intrinsic mass cannot travel at the speed of light. As an object's speed comes closer to c, its mass (and so kinetic energy) increases and it is therefore harder to accelerate it to a speed even closer to c. I understand that traveling at c would give the object an infinite mass and an infinite energy of motion and thus such travel is not allowed. However, how can the object have a finite mass and finite energy while approaching a finite number (c), only to have an infinite mass and an infinite energy when it finally gets there? What makes c so special?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of c as a universal speed limit. The total energy of a particle as a function of its speed is given by:

E = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}

So, while the speed remains finite, the total energy of a particle approaches infinity as v approaches c.
 
Last edited:
Ah, fantastic. Thanks a lot.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top