What Makes Up the Solidity of Tables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluecap
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around how to explain the composition of tables in a way that is engaging and avoids complex scientific jargon. The original poster seeks a simplified explanation that captures the essence of quantum mechanics without overwhelming their date with technical terms like "Bohmian" or "Copenhagen." They suggest that tables are made up of many small particles influenced by invisible forces, leading to the perception of solidity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of piquing interest before delving into deeper quantum concepts, advocating for a straightforward approach that highlights the mystery of matter without complicating the explanation with advanced theories. The goal is to create curiosity about the nature of reality while keeping the conversation accessible and relatable.
bluecap
Messages
395
Reaction score
13
I want to describe to a date what are tables made of without having to tell her about quantum mechanics or wave function.

I plan to say something like this.

Scientists don't know what are the particles in the tables made up of.. whether they are localized particles or made up of dream stuff or made up of maths.

She may answer back: But tables are solid.. how could they be anything else?

I may say: But when the math interfere.. it produce matter.. scientists called the process decoherence.

But the above would sound nerdy. What is the best way to say it? The localized particles being bohmians.

I got this idea from Demystifier who described it in the thread Pilot Waves of Apples

"Yes. According to the Bohmian interpretation, the apples and oranges we can touch are made of a large number of pointlike particles. Those particles are guided by the wave, but we don't touch the wave itself.

On the other hand, the Copenhagen interpretation is not so specific about what these things we touch are really made of. But even though it is not very specific about that, it definitely denies the existence of those Bohmian pointlike particles."

How do you rephrase it without using the word Bohmian or Copenhagen.

How about the following:

Science doesn't know what tables are made of.. either by a large number of pointlike particles that is guided by an invisible wave, or invisible things that appear to be solid due to interferences of mysterious substances or wave.

I don't want to complicate it by describing Many worlds.

Please give your own description like what I just described without using the words wave function, Bohmians or Copenhagen. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Many tables are made of wood. Some are made of plastic or metal or other substances. All of these are in turn composed of a great number of very small molecules. All scientists agree about this.

So what is the question again? And by the way, after that answer: what is the difference between a table and a chair? At some level, I hope you will see that the answer above is as good as any possible answer to your question.
 
DrChinese said:
Many tables are made of wood. Some are made of plastic or metal or other substances. All of these are in turn composed of a great number of very small molecules. All scientists agree about this.

So what is the question again? And by the way, after that answer: what is the difference between a table and a chair? At some level, I hope you will see that the answer above is as good as any possible answer to your question.

I want to describe to her the quantum mystery like whether particles are explained by CI, Bohmians, Many Worlds, Objective Collapse or TI.. but for introduction.. don't want her to take the whole medicine first.. but just doing it at a time.. so what words to describe them to her *initially*... because if I mention any world like Bohmian, she may just get bored... so want to pique her interests first.
 
Last edited:
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top