What Math Is This? (Logic of Mathematics)

In summary: It isn't true that P(x) is true for all x ≡ not all x have a value of "true".There is a quantifier in each of the first three lines, but they're not really doing anything with them. I suppose the first line means that:~(∀x : P(x) ) ≡ Ex: ~(P(x)) which meansIt isn't true that P(x) is true for all x ≡ not all x have a value of "true".In summary, this is a picture of a math equation with incorrect statements. Symbolic Logic is involved, as is the use of quantifiers.
  • #1
askor
169
9
Can someone please tell me what math is this (see below pic)? For example: algebra, calculus, etc.
 

Attachments

  • mathlogic.PNG
    mathlogic.PNG
    3.3 KB · Views: 111
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • Like
Likes Klystron and Dale
  • #3
Does the Truth Table is included in Symbolic Logic?
 
  • #4
Truth tables are an important basic tool of logic. But once some basic symbolic logic has been established (often using truth tables), it is easier to manipulate the symbols without resorting to truth tables.
 
  • #6
askor said:
Can someone please tell me what math is this (see below pic)?
Note that some of the statements in the picture are incorrect.
 
  • #7
I'd say this is Sentence Logic, as the inner structure of sentences is not considered, but rather it only matters whether they're assigned one of the values T or F.
 
  • #8
askor said:
Can someone please tell me what math is this (see below pic)? For example: algebra, calculus, etc.
pbuk said:
Note that some of the statements in the picture are incorrect.
Rhut-rho. @askor -- Please always post links to where you get images and quotes, etc. Where did you get this?
 
  • #9
My bad. I think I was only partially right, given the quantifies. It seems like a mix of Sentence Logic and Symbolic/First Order Logic. My bad.
 
  • #10
WWGD said:
My bad. I think I was only partially right, given the quantifies. It seems like a mix of Sentence Logic and Symbolic/First Order Logic. My bad.
Their use of quantifiers is weird. In all but the first two lines, p and q are logic propositions, which might be true or false, but ∀p or ∃p, really doesn't make sense make by itself. I suppose the first line means that:
~(∀x : P(x) ) ≡ Ex: ~(P(x)) which means
It isn't true that P(x) is true for all x is equivalent to there exists an x for which P(x) is false.
P(x) is a proposition that depends on x, such as x is married. This means the same as: if not everyone is married, there must exist an unmarried person.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD

1. What is the logic of mathematics?

The logic of mathematics refers to the systematic and rational approach used to solve mathematical problems and prove mathematical statements. It involves using reasoning, critical thinking, and rules of logic to arrive at a correct solution.

2. Why is math considered a language?

Math is considered a language because it has its own set of symbols, rules, and syntax that are used to communicate and express ideas and concepts. Like any other language, it can be used to describe and analyze the world around us.

3. How is math used in everyday life?

Math is used in everyday life in various ways, such as calculating expenses, telling time, measuring ingredients in cooking, and understanding sports statistics. It is also used in more complex fields like engineering, finance, and computer science.

4. What is the importance of understanding the logic of mathematics?

Understanding the logic of mathematics is important because it helps us develop critical thinking skills, make logical and rational decisions, and solve problems effectively. It also allows us to better understand and analyze patterns and relationships in the world around us.

5. Can anyone learn the logic of mathematics?

Yes, anyone can learn the logic of mathematics with proper instruction and practice. It is a skill that can be developed and improved upon with time and effort. While some people may have a natural aptitude for math, anyone can become proficient with dedication and perseverance.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
878
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
11
Views
514
Replies
6
Views
682
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
872
Back
Top