MHB What mistake did I make while solving the Ferris wheel trig problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeedHelp27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig Wheel
NeedHelp27
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, all. For homework, we got a problem that reads as follows: A Ferris wheel 50 ft in diameter makes one revolution every 40 sec. If the center of the wheel is 30 ft above the ground, how long after reaching the low point is a rider 50 ft above the ground? Our teacher said to model the situation with an equation.

When I tried to go about doing this, I drew a graph showing the person's height, at it ended up being the cosine graph shifted up 5 and over so that a low point was on the y-axis (0,5). Next, I tried to write the equation in the form f(x)=acos(bx+c)+d. I did (max value - min value)/2 = (55-5)/2=25 to find a. Then, because one revolution takes 40 seconds, I solved 2pi/b=40 for b and got b=pi/20. The graph is shifted 5 up, so d-5. That gave me f(x)=25cos((pix)/20+c)+5. I also have the point (0,5) on the graph, so I can plug it into get c. f(0)=5=25cos(c)+5. C ended up being pi/2.

Then I went to solve the problem.
f(t)=50=25cos((pix)/20+pi/2)+5.
When I finally isolated x, I got a domain error. Where did I go wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If we let the point in time (in seconds) where the rider is at the lowest point be $t=0$, then we could write:

$$f(t)=-25\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{20}t\right)+30$$

Now try solving the question. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top