What MIT OCW courses can help clarify tensor concepts in physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the exploration of MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) courses, specifically 8.01 and 8.012, to clarify tensor concepts in physics. Participants highlight that tensors are often introduced in mechanics courses but lack dedicated coverage, particularly in general relativity. Key points include the definition of tensors as vectors of vectors, with rank 2 tensors having nine components in three-dimensional space. The conversation emphasizes the practical application of tensors in mechanics, particularly through momentum flux and the dot product with covectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic vector concepts
  • Familiarity with mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations
  • Basic grasp of scalar and vector quantities
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore MIT OCW course 8.01: Classical Mechanics for foundational concepts
  • Investigate MIT OCW course 8.012: Second Semester Physics for advanced applications
  • Research textbooks specifically addressing tensors in mechanics, avoiding general relativity focus
  • Learn about the practical applications of tensors in fluid dynamics and momentum analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those in mechanics courses, educators seeking to clarify tensor concepts, and anyone interested in the application of tensors in physical sciences.

3102
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am working through the MIT OCW courses 8.01 and 8.012. At my university we already learned about tensors in the first mechanics course but I don't really understand them completely.

Therefore I am searching for some MIT OCW course that covers tensors.
I'd be glad at any help.

Apart from that I've got some more questions:

1) When are tensors ordinarily covered in physics?

2) Could anyone give me some textbook recommendations for tensors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I was in school, tensors never really got covered as a dedicated subject. It just appeared from time to time, and we were more or less expected to just understand it. But it is typically covered in some detail in general relativity, which I never took. Most definitions of tensors revolve involve tensors in curved space, which is too complicated for someone who just wants to use tensors in mechanics. There are definitions which talk about how a tensor transforms under coordinate transformations. These definitions are mostly useless for your purposes. Since this is the majority of textbooks on tensors, I'm not going to recommend a textbook.

You know what a vector is right? A rank 2 tensor is simply a vector of vectors. A rank 3 tensor is a vector of vectors of vectors (or a vector of rank 2 tensors). Momentum is a vector. Now if you consider a fluid that carries momentum along with it, you can have a momentum flux. The fluid itself moves with some velocity, so you have a vector of vectors, or a rank 2 scalar. A vector in 3D has 3 components: vx, vy, vz. A rank 2 tensor in 3D also has three components, but each component is a vector, so there are 9 components total. It doesn't really matter if each fluid parcel carries only a little momentum and the fluid is moving fast, or each parcel carries a lot of momentum, and the fluid is slow; the momentum flux is the outer product of the fluid velocity and parcel momentum.

Often, you want to know the amount of a vector pointing in some direction. You would take the dot product of the vector and a surface normal (which looks like a vector but more properly should be called a covector), and you get a scalar (a rank 0 tensor). You can do the same for a rank 2 tensor, except that when you take the dot product of a rank 2 tensor with a covector you get a vector (a rank 1 tensor). You don't need to know all the stuff with contravariant and covariant vectors until you get into general relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes 3102
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K