What physics area should I choose?

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting physics courses at university, with a focus on how these choices may impact future academic and career opportunities. Participants explore various areas of physics, including particle physics, astrophysics, computational physics, and the relevance of specific courses like quantum mechanics, special relativity, and general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Quantum Mechanics II is essential for graduate school, while Computational Physics may provide both marketable skills and relevance for further studies.
  • There is a discussion about the practical applications of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos, with some arguing that the training in understanding disordered systems is valuable.
  • Concerns are raised about the perceived theoretical nature of particle physics and astrophysics, with some participants questioning their job market viability.
  • One participant expresses a desire to focus on astrophysics and cosmology, inquiring about the necessity of studying special relativity and general relativity.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of finding a topic that captivates personal interest, suggesting that passion for a subject can lead to greater engagement and success.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality of various physics fields, with some advocating for computational skills while others defend the value of theoretical topics like astrophysics and particle physics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best course selections and their implications for future careers.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the importance of marketability in course selection, while others prioritize personal interest and engagement with the subject matter. There are references to prior knowledge and coursework that may influence current decisions.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering their course selections in physics, particularly those interested in the implications for graduate studies and career paths in STEM fields.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
My university offers some courses in different areas, such as

- Particle Physics (I, II)

- Nuclear Physics (I, II)

- Astrophysics (I)

-Modern Atrophysics (I,II)

- Computational Physics (I, II)

- SR/GR

- Nonlinear Dynamical Sys and Chaos (I, II)

- QM II

So I am allowed to take 6 courses from these topics, I am not sure which ones should I pick. I want to do my masters abroad (Canada or in some European country).
In general, I want to stay in school and do my masters but for example, if I wanted to another job like working for the government or in a private company, then which one should I pursue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QMII is essential if you are headed to grad school.

Computational Physics (I,II) will give you both some marketable skills as well as likely being useful in grad school.

Odds are Nonlinear Dynamical Sys and Chaos (I, II) will also provide marketable skills and may be useful in grad school.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
Dr. Courtney said:
QMII is essential if you are headed to grad school.

Computational Physics (I,II) will give you both some marketable skills as well as likely being useful in grad school.

Odds are Nonlinear Dynamical Sys and Chaos (I, II) will also provide marketable skills and may be useful in grad school.
I see, well thanks for your reply. Most poeple prefer Computational Physics. What is Chaos used for ?
 
Arman777 said:
I see, well thanks for your reply. Most poeple prefer Computational Physics. What is Chaos used for ?

It's more the training in seeing how to understand the dynamics of disordered systems of differential equations, combined with the computational skills to see what they are doing in the first place. If these courses are good, you'll develop lots of skills solving and understanding differential equations for disorderly systems. "Chaos" is not so much the point, but rather the training you'll pick up to understand the chaos.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
I see your point. So particle physics or astrophysics are dead topics I guess or they are too much theoretical ? So that if I can't get a job in uni i ll be wasted my years..
 
Arman777 said:
What is Chaos used for ?

Chaos is a ladder
:wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
Arman777 said:
I see your point. So particle physics or astrophysics are dead topics I guess or they are too much theoretical ? So that if I can't get a job in uni i ll be wasted my years..

Not dead by any means. Just less likely to be as useful downstream given your goals and intent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
I want to ask a question. I decided to focus on astrophysics mainly on cosmology... and comp physics. In this case I should defintly take SR and GR classes right ?
 
Arman777 said:
I want to ask a question. I decided to focus on astrophysics mainly on cosmology... and comp physics. In this case I should defintly take SR and GR classes right ?

You should study SR regardless of what kind of physics you are going to do. You should have studied it in first year undergrad.

Astrophysics and cosmology are stuffed tight with application of GR. If you are doing those subjects you should be doing all the GR you can force into your brain. Maybe you don't need to carry a copy of "Gravitation" around with you wherever you go. But you should certainly get a copy of _Gravitation and Cosmology_ by Weinberg.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/8126517557/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #10
As to the "what should I study" question. You should try to find the topic that holds your attention. The thing that, when it is in your field of view it draws you to go look. The thing that when you work on it, hours pass and you have not noticed, don't need to be pushed to work on, and need to be called to stop working on and go have dinner etc.

If you can find a topic that grabs you this way, you won't need to be driven. You will naturally just go and work on it all the time. And progress will feel *good*.

Don't be primarily concerned with what is marketable. You will pick up marketable in almost any area of physics. You will learn how to understand and solve problems. That's marketable. It's cool if you pick up extra skills. It never hurts to know a computer language, for example. It never hurts to learn how to do any related skill. Lab classes if you are interested and capable that way. Any related subject that will support your "subject that holds you" is likely to also be marketable.

But if you can be passionate about something, then your work will be keen and interesting and fun.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #11
Thanks I agree with you. I guess cosmology has been my interest over 4 years. We learned little SR in the modern physics course but This semester I ll take a course only related to the SR and then next semester about GR.
DEvens said:
Gravitation and Cosmology_ by Weinberg
Thats is a real classic :) Thanks for the advice
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K