What Power Values Are Used in Transformer Efficiency Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the efficiency of a transformer, use the formula 100 x Pload/Pin, where Pin is the total power measured at the wall plug. The output power (Pout) refers to the power delivered to the load, while input power (Pin) must account for various losses, including joule heating, core losses, and winding losses. Factors such as self and mutual inductance, as well as power factor, significantly impact efficiency calculations. For accurate analytical efficiency assessments, all losses should be considered as functions of load and input voltage. Understanding these parameters is crucial for both practical measurements and design processes.
sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
When I calculate efficiency of a transformer, I use output power/imput power x100%. Then what are these power values? Is the power the power in a load or the total power coming out of the transformer (meaning it includes the joule heating)? Then also what about the input power, which values do I use? Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to consider any source of joule heating in the transformer, plus anything that creates a power factor <1. There are several classes of things you need to consider:

1) Self inductance and power factor (primary), and inductive (excitation current) losses.
2) mutual inductance (coupling efficiency to secondary circuit)
3) Core losses (eddy currents in laminations, hysteresis losses, magnetostriction*)
4) copper winding losses(I2R losses, primary and secondary, also eddy currents in copper)
5) secondary circuit losses (in load).

The overall efficiency is 100 x Pload/Pin, where Pin is measured at the wall plug. Are you talking about joule power (real) or reactive power (volt-amps)?

* If you can hear the transformer or feel vibrations, there are magneotstrictive losses.
 
Bob S said:
You need to consider any source of joule heating in the transformer, plus anything that creates a power factor <1. There are several classes of things you need to consider:

1) Self inductance and power factor (primary), and inductive (excitation current) losses.
2) mutual inductance (coupling efficiency to secondary circuit)
3) Core losses (eddy currents in laminations, hysteresis losses, magnetostriction*)
4) copper winding losses(I2R losses, primary and secondary, also eddy currents in copper)
5) secondary circuit losses (in load).

The overall efficiency is 100 x Pload/Pin, where Pin is measured at the wall plug. Are you talking about joule power (real) or reactive power (volt-amps)?

* If you can hear the transformer or feel vibrations, there are magneotstrictive losses.

Oh so the cables getting heard is not included in the Pin or Pout? So its the power at the load, and the power from the generator?
 
If we know the input and output current and voltages ( for example by measurement) then we can calculate the efficiency easily. All the losses are included in Pin-Pout. However , If we would like to calculate the efficiency analytically ( as in design process), we need to consider and calculate the losses as a function of the load ( and the input voltage). Core losses are not easy to calculate and just some approximations may be made.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top