What really cause light to appear slower in media?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EHT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cause Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanisms that cause light to appear slower in different media. One explanation involves the absorption and re-emission of photons by atoms, where the density and speed of this process affect light's drift speed. An alternative view suggests that light's phase velocity decreases due to interference between the original light and newly radiated electromagnetic waves from atoms. The conversation also touches on the complexities of group and phase velocities, particularly in materials with negative refractive indices. Ultimately, the participants seek clarity on whether the decreased phase velocity is due to drift velocity, phase differences, or other factors, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of quantum mechanical interactions.
EHT
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Some textbooks that I read explain it in a way kind of like this:
In a material the photons is absorbed by an atom and then re-emitted a short time later, it then travels at a short distance to the next atom and get absorbed&emitted again and so on. How quickly the atoms in a material can absorb and re-emit the photon and how dense the atoms decides the speed of light in that material. So the light appears slower because it has a smaller “drift speed”.

But recently I realize an alternative explanation:
Atoms respond to the light by radiating electromagnetic wave. This “new light” interferes with the “old light” in some way that result in delayed light, consequently effectively the light covers a smaller phase each second. Which gives the impression of a lower phase velocity . However the group velocity is changing in a complicated way.

I think that the first explanation does not explain the change in phase velocity of light. if we consider light traveling into a slab of negative refractive index non-dispersive material, let’s say the light is directed perpendicular to the slab. The phase velocity’s direction will be flipped, but group velocity’s direction in the material will not change. Only the second explanation can explain the flipped phase velocity direction. I guess that the velocity that we get in the first explanation is actually belongs to the group velocity. It makes sense to me that the front most of the photon stream determines the first information that the light delivers. Am I right?
 
Science news on Phys.org
You can read the explanation in the FAQ in the General Physics Forum.
 
I have read it, but it doesn't really answering my question. I already agree that the absorption-emission process isn't related with the atomic transition. I was thinking that the media is a fluid, I thought that there will be no such fine pattern as in the solid, therefore the phonons' effect will not be important. And for the absorption process I was talking about a non-energy shifting or an elastic absorption, which gives delay too, but I don't know whether it is significant or not. I don't really understand about this, would you mind to explain?

Despite of the absorption-emission process. What I want to ask is what really cause the phase velocity of light to be decreased?
1. decreased "drift velocity" of photons ( they aren't the same photons, they are re-emitted all the time)
or
2. phase difference between absorbed and emitted light
or
something else
 
The absorption-emission picture of electromagnetic waves traveling through a dielectric medium is just a beginner's visualization model. The wave is interacting with all the matter in its path, not just a single atom. So a better visualization is that of someone running through mud. The runner is not continually destroyed and recreated. Rather, he is slowed down when the interaction with surrounding material is stronger.
 
@chrisbaird during the silence of this thread, I already upgraded my understanding. Now I understand that in the wave point of view, the light is not absorbed, the light is just interfering with the new light waves emitted by the atoms that result in delayed light(advanced in phase),this can easily shown by using simple phasor diagram. Consequently effectively the light covers a smaller phase each second. Which then gives the impression of a lower phase velocity. This wave point of view is corrrect for every wavelength. And for the case of light's wavelength larger than atom's spacing, if we view the light as photons, the photons will be absorbed and re-emitted by the atoms as a group (phonons). My problem is if the light's wavelength is smaller than the distance between neighboring atoms, then one photon will only collide with one atom at a time. Therefore we need another absorption mechanism involving quantum mechanics. Is it primarily governed by spontaneous or stimulated absorption/emission?or else?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top