What remains of an atom is ripped apart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lauthiamkok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential fate of the universe under the influence of dark energy, particularly the "Big Rip" scenario, where the universe's expansion accelerates to the point of tearing apart galaxies, solar systems, and even atoms. As matter dilutes, it could lead to a state where particles become isolated in separate regions of space. Some theories suggest that quantum fluctuations might allow for the creation of new universes, potentially leading to a cyclical process akin to the inflationary epoch. However, this model challenges fundamental assumptions in physics. Ultimately, the conversation reflects on the implications of dark energy and the universe's eventual fate.
lauthiamkok
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
http://hubblesite.org/hubble_discoveries/dark_energy/de-fate_of_the_universe.php

"With dark energy, the fate of the universe might go well beyond the Big Chill. In the strangest and most speculative scenario, as the universe expands ever faster, all of gravity's work will be undone. Clusters of galaxies will disband and separate. Then galaxies themselves will be torn apart. The solar system, stars, planets, and even molecules and atoms could be shredded by the ever-faster expansion. The universe that was born in a violent expansion could end with an even more violent expansion called the Big Rip."

And then what? Does the universe recycle itself? Is there something after nothing?

What remains of an atom is ripped apart?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hrm. I'm pretty sure bound systems, such as the solar system, a galaxy (?), or atoms do not get "ripped apart" by the dark energy expansion.

But at any rate, after all this happens there is pretty much nothing. Matter dilutes and dilutes until there is hardly anything left. One can imagine a scenario in which every single particle is completely isolated and in its separate universe from all other particles. Not a very exciting time to live in.

Some will say that due to the fact that quantum mechanics allows for some pretty strange things to happen, although with exceedingly low probability, that eventually there will be a fluctuation which in essence "creates a new universe" and in this pocket of spacetime it all repeats again. I'd rather not take such notions too seriously, but it is a bit intriguing.
 
I had a long winded answer, but, nabeshin worded it better.
 
You're obviously talking about the "Big Rip" scenario.
There, the density of Dark Energy increases without bound, ripping everything apart. You end up whíth a state quite similar to the inflationary epoch at the beginning of the universe, so the universe might start all over again.
However, this model is at odds with some of our most basic assumptions about physics and reality.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top