Undergrad What should be continuous at the interface of two materials?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the continuity of various potentials at the interfaces of different materials, specifically conductors and semiconductors. It establishes that the chemical potential, also known as the Fermi energy, is continuous across metal-metal, semiconductor-semiconductor, and metal-semiconductor junctions. The electric potential is generally continuous, although surface charge can introduce apparent discontinuities in the electric field. Key references include Henisch's "Semiconductor Contacts" and Lampert's "Current Injection in Solids," which provide deeper insights into semiconductor interfaces under various conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical potential and Fermi energy in solid-state physics
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations and boundary conditions
  • Knowledge of semiconductor physics and junction behavior
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Henisch's "Semiconductor Contacts" for in-depth analysis of semiconductor interfaces
  • Read Lampert's "Current Injection in Solids" for insights on metal/insulator systems
  • Explore the continuity of electric potential in semiconductor physics
  • Investigate the implications of surface charge on electric fields at material interfaces
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers working in semiconductor technology, materials science, and electrostatics, particularly those focused on junction behavior and interface phenomena.

Dor
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
At the interface between:
1) conductor/conductor
2) conductor/semiconductor (or dielectric)
3) semiconductor/semiconductor (or dielectric/dielectric)

What quantity should be continuous?
Is it the electrochemical potential, only the chemical potential or is it the electric potential?

Since they are all related by Vec=Vc+Ve, if two of them are continuous then all of them are continuous, but I think this situations cannot be true.
However, I know that the Fermi energy is continuous (which I think is the chemical potential but I'm not sure since there's a lot of misleading information). Also the electric potential should be continuous, otherwise the electric field (defined by E=-grad(Ve)) would be infinity.

The question refers both for equilibrium and for an applied voltage (steady currents).

I couldn't find any information on this matter. All books on semiconductors or electrostatic/dynamic does not mention it and does not get to much deep into such physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the context of this question?
The word "should" implies that there is an objective.

Of out context, many answers are possible. For example, the temperature should be continuous.
If they are talking about flashlight components, then voltage should be continuous - because all junctions would be ohmic.
 
l'm trying to understand the physics behind the interfaces of to materials, especially between semiconductors and metal (or poor conductor) electrodes. Both at equilibrium and at applied voltage
 
I haven't studied such things for many decades, and I'm not near my books at work (and was never much of an expert in any case) so I hope my answers are correct--you should check them. The chemical potential μ is continuous across metal-metal, semi-semi and metal-semi junctions. The Fermi energy is related and is often confused for μ as you have noticed, but it is the chemical potential that you want to look at. Am less sure about electric potential. One can build up surface charge on a dielectric-metal interface, for example, which introduces discontinuities in E field (see any discussion of boundary conditions for Maxwell's equations), but that should still lead to a continuous potential.

You might search out the book by Henisch, I think it's called Semiconductor Contacts. It specializes on the topic of semiconductor interfaces under various biases and with and without current injection. There is also a quite old but very clear book on metal/insulator systems by Lampert, something like Current Injection in Solids.
 
Thanks for the answer. I will look for the books you suggested.
However, there is a problem with Maxwell's boundaries. If the electric potential was continuous, then the voltage drop on a diode for example was that of the source without any consideration of the built-in potential. Than obviously it is not continuous. So how do I describ these interfacess from fundamental prinsiples (like Maxwell's equation for example)?
And how does the electrochemical potential renters this story?
 
The potential for even abrupt pn junctions is smooth and continuous. This is covered in all semiconductor texts. Do you have Sze, for example?
 
Sure, but is it true also for metal/semiconductor interface?
 
I did not study metal/semiconductor carefully, but for semiconductor/semiconductor:

1- The electric potential is continuous
2- The electric field is discontinuous
3- The charge density is discontinuous
4- The electric displacement field is continuous
5- The electron chemical potential (also known is Fermi level) is continous
6- The species chemical potentials (e.g. Silicon, oxygen, ...) is continuous and in fact constant under equilbrium
7- Band edges are discontinuous.
 
Dor said:
At the interface between:
1) conductor/conductor
2) conductor/semiconductor (or dielectric)
3) semiconductor/semiconductor (or dielectric/dielectric)

What quantity should be continuous?
Is it the electrochemical potential, only the chemical potential or is it the electric potential?
Well, in equilibrium, the electrochemical potential should be constant over the sample. On the surface the usual boundary conditions hold for D and E. However, the polarisation typically leads to a generation of a charge layer at the surface, which may make it appear as if the electric fields are discontinuous on a macroscopic scale.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K