- #1
jeebs
- 325
- 4
Hi,
I am a physics student in England, doing my 4th (masters) year and will be finished in June 2011. I have been trying to decide what to do next and I am struggling. I really enjoy my course, I'd happily stay at uni for the rest of my life just going to lectures, learning physics and solving homework problems, but that obviously isn't going to happen. This is why thoughts of a PhD have crossed my mind - I want to carry on getting deeper into the subject because it would be such a shame to get to the end of this year and just leave it at that. I mean, I've came this far, and physics is the only thing I have ever put any time or effort into, I don't know how to do anything else. I'm hoping to finish with a 1st, if not a high 2.1.
The thing is, I'm not sure if a PhD would be the most sensible choice. I get the impression that most physics PhD's in the UK are to do with materials science, like semiconductors etc. To be honest I'm not hugely interested in that sort of area, I've had good grades in those sorts of modules but they just don't do it for me. I think my most favourite topics are particle physics & quantum mechanics, but is there really a demand for this sort of PhD? I've been reading about the basics of QFT and the like recently, and I think I'd like to get taught about that stuff properly.
Will this sort of thing be taught in many (or all) physics PhD's?
Also, if I was to stay on and get a PhD in a given area, would that really restrict me to that area in my future career options? If so, there is no way I am doing a PhD I don't really enjoy because then I'd be stuck there for life...
Anyway, one other thing has caught my eye recently. I've been getting emails advertising qualifications relating to nuclear fusion (plasma physics and so on), York university in particular seems to have a big fusion doctoral training scheme with ties to Culham etc. I remember first hearing about what fusion was in a lesson at school when I was about 16, and thinking "Woh. that is insane". I never dreamed I could ever be involved with it, but I would love to have a go at that. Is this something I could realistically pursue, or is it an area I would struggle to make my way in, if I went for a PhD in this area? Do I even stand more than a snowball in hell's chance of getting onto a course such as this? Is this the kind of qualification I'd have to get more student loans to pursue or would I likely be paid to do this sort of thing? (I am in about £35000 of student debt already!)
Lastly, what if I get a PhD place and decide I don't like it? would it be worse to stick it out for the 3 years or to quit early?
What if I have nothing lined up at the end of this year? will it hurt my chances of ever getting onto a PhD course if I just go back home after the end of this degree and just bum around doing daft little dead end jobs?
Thanks.
I am a physics student in England, doing my 4th (masters) year and will be finished in June 2011. I have been trying to decide what to do next and I am struggling. I really enjoy my course, I'd happily stay at uni for the rest of my life just going to lectures, learning physics and solving homework problems, but that obviously isn't going to happen. This is why thoughts of a PhD have crossed my mind - I want to carry on getting deeper into the subject because it would be such a shame to get to the end of this year and just leave it at that. I mean, I've came this far, and physics is the only thing I have ever put any time or effort into, I don't know how to do anything else. I'm hoping to finish with a 1st, if not a high 2.1.
The thing is, I'm not sure if a PhD would be the most sensible choice. I get the impression that most physics PhD's in the UK are to do with materials science, like semiconductors etc. To be honest I'm not hugely interested in that sort of area, I've had good grades in those sorts of modules but they just don't do it for me. I think my most favourite topics are particle physics & quantum mechanics, but is there really a demand for this sort of PhD? I've been reading about the basics of QFT and the like recently, and I think I'd like to get taught about that stuff properly.
Will this sort of thing be taught in many (or all) physics PhD's?
Also, if I was to stay on and get a PhD in a given area, would that really restrict me to that area in my future career options? If so, there is no way I am doing a PhD I don't really enjoy because then I'd be stuck there for life...
Anyway, one other thing has caught my eye recently. I've been getting emails advertising qualifications relating to nuclear fusion (plasma physics and so on), York university in particular seems to have a big fusion doctoral training scheme with ties to Culham etc. I remember first hearing about what fusion was in a lesson at school when I was about 16, and thinking "Woh. that is insane". I never dreamed I could ever be involved with it, but I would love to have a go at that. Is this something I could realistically pursue, or is it an area I would struggle to make my way in, if I went for a PhD in this area? Do I even stand more than a snowball in hell's chance of getting onto a course such as this? Is this the kind of qualification I'd have to get more student loans to pursue or would I likely be paid to do this sort of thing? (I am in about £35000 of student debt already!)
Lastly, what if I get a PhD place and decide I don't like it? would it be worse to stick it out for the 3 years or to quit early?
What if I have nothing lined up at the end of this year? will it hurt my chances of ever getting onto a PhD course if I just go back home after the end of this degree and just bum around doing daft little dead end jobs?
Thanks.
Last edited: