What Software is Commonly Used to Make Professional Papers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlete
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the best software for writing and publishing academic papers, particularly for undergraduates preparing research theses. LaTeX is highly recommended for its professional appearance, especially for publications like those from the American Physical Society (APS). While some journals accept Microsoft Word, LaTeX is preferred for its formatting capabilities. Users are advised to utilize specific style files, such as revtex4 for APS publications and elsart.cls for Elsevier, which offer customizable formatting options including larger fonts and double-spacing suitable for grading. The learning curve for LaTeX is acknowledged, with suggestions to seek help from experienced users and access university-provided style files. Additionally, tools like Ghostscript and WinEdt are mentioned for managing graphics and document compilation. Overall, LaTeX is deemed the best choice for thesis writing, while Word and PowerPoint are suggested for shorter documents and presentations.
mathlete
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
This sounds like a stupid question... probably because it is. :-p But what program(s) is commonly accepted as the standard for writing and publishing papers? Obviously as an undergrad I just use Word (and Excel for the graphs) and get away with it, but when I compare the composition (not content, obviously) to real ones it looks like crud. Since I'm doing a research thesis next semester I'd like to make it look professional... so...

What's used? LaTex? Origin? Any hints or links to the formation of a good paper would be appreciated :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Always use LaTex.

Some journals are starting to except Word but Latex looks more professional, imo.

The link above will give you access to the revtex4 style file which is what Phys Rev use - for me this isn't want you want: the font is too small for a project thesis (eg. if I supervise work I dock points for small font - lack of consideration to reader).

You should check out the style files supplied by Elsevier - elsart.cls

(If you go into the elsart file you can comment out "preprint submitted to Elsevier" which will appear on the front page)

This style has a nice large font - and can be double spaced while still looking good.

Alternatively, just use the article class from standard LaTex - which, of course, you can also customise.

Finally, make all your figures in postscript (eps) format - use the includgraphics command and resize box to scale them.
 
J77 said:
The link above will give you access to the revtex4 style file which is what Phys Rev use - for me this isn't want you want: the font is too small for a project thesis (eg. if I supervise work I dock points for small font - lack of consideration to reader).

Good point... the most professional looking format (i.e. publication-ready) isn't always the most appropriate format for the purpose at hand. When I'm grading something like this, I want it double-spaced so I have plenty of room to write comments.

Of course, if you set things up properly, it's a simple matter to produce more than one format of output from the same file, by changing one or two style settings.
 
jtbell said:
Good point... the most professional looking format (i.e. publication-ready) isn't always the most appropriate format for the purpose at hand.

Nice way of putting it. Also note: LaTex is GREAT... but has a BIG learning curve. It's best to start by having someone else who uses it help you out on getting all the files... and give you their style and tex files for a similar document to the one you want to make... and making sure it compiles OK on your machine.

In addition to the revtex4 style file and resources on Exclesier, if you are writing a thesis in LaTex (and if possible, I wouldn't use ANYTHING ELSE for THAT) many universities provide a style file via an internet link on their graduate schools' webpages, if you aren't lucky enough to get it from a lab-mate.

Ghostscript freeware is also often useful for fixing small things about the format of ps/eps files... which are frequently the best format to use in LaTex. WinEdt (a downloadable that is about $20 to register) is also great for using jointly with LaTex.

I tend to use LaTex for many documents... but (ugh... ) Microsoft Word and Powerpoint for shorter (non-equation/non-table bound) documents (like my CV) and for presentations... although other people find and use freeware program that can produce .pdf files or similar formats.

In that sense... I'm also a BIG fan of the complete version of Adobe's ACROBAT program... it's useful because then you can make ANY program "print" something out in pdf format. The student version is pretty cheap. :biggrin:

I made my paper and thesis graphs in Origin (MUCH MUCH better then Excel -- which I NEVER use), printed the graphs to pdf using acrobat, converted them to eps using ghostscript, and put them into LaTex documents created in the WinEdt program (ultimately getting a pdf output when the LaTex was compiled through WinEdt). A pain ... but they looked best that way.
 
...and if you don't use windows:

latex foo.tex (or Ctrl-c-c in emacs <-- this I use for everything)
dvips foo.dvi -o giving you a postscript document...

or dvips -Ppdf -G0 foo.dvi
ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=a4 foo.ps giving you a pdf document.

You can pretty much get style/class files for whatever you're doing by searching Google - eg. I have one for my CV.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top