What stops the earth from colliding w/ moon?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ucsdhopeful
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Moon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Earth and Moon do not collide due to their mutual gravitational attraction and the concept of barycenter, where both bodies orbit a common center of mass located within the Earth. This orbital dynamic is maintained by their respective momentum, preventing a direct collision. The Moon's elliptical orbit causes it to approach and recede from the Earth, but the gravitational forces and the motion of both bodies keep them in a stable orbit. Misunderstandings about the term "wobble" have led to confusion regarding their interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of barycenter in celestial mechanics
  • Knowledge of elliptical orbits and their characteristics
  • Basic physics principles related to momentum and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of barycenter in more detail
  • Study the dynamics of elliptical orbits in celestial mechanics
  • Explore the effects of gravitational forces on orbital stability
  • Learn about momentum and its role in orbital motion
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of celestial bodies and their orbits.

ucsdhopeful
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I understand orbit and why the moon doesn't collide with the earth, but why doesn't the Earth collide with the moon? Shouldn't the mutual gravitational forces attract each other, get stronger, until they eventually meet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope, the Earth orbits the moon just as the moon orbits the Earth. The center of both orbits is a point somewhere between the Earth and the moon.
 
Their momentum keeps them going around each other.

There would have to be a force inward to interrupt this.

When the moon is at the closest point in its elliptical orbit it does pull Earth closer to it, that is true, but when it goes back to its furthest point, Earth moves in towards the moon again (in the other direction)

Here's a good .gif:
DFOrbitalP4.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the moon doesn't just orbit the earth, as the center of gravity is where they orbit round, the COG is between the Earth and the moon in space somewhere, the moon doesn't fly right down to the Earth as it's velocity counteracts the gravitational field, keeping it iin orbit but not colliding into us, the same happens for the Earth =D hope that helps :D
 
actually the COM of the earth-moon system lies inside the Earth's mass.as both of the Earth and moon pull each other with equal forces,the both wobble around itself.now this wobbling is the main reason why they both don't collide.they wobble in a way in which when the moon approches Earth by the nearest distance,the Earth wobbles and hence kepps it away from the moon.if this wobbling or dual revolving characteristic of a body a dual body system isn't present the it will be certain in any such system for the lighter body to collide with the heavier one..
 
actually the COM of the earth-moon system lies inside the Earth's mass.as both of the Earth and moon pull each other with equal forces,the both wobble around itself.now this wobbling is the main reason why they both don't collide.they wobble in a way in which when the moon approches Earth by the nearest distance,the Earth wobbles and hence kepps it away from the moon.if this wobbling or dual revolving characteristic of a body a dual body system isn't present the it will be certain in any such system for the lighter body to collide with the heavier one..

we can also see this scenario as an approch by the Earth to latitudly increase celestial orbid using the force of moon on earth,as shown in .gif graphic above..
 
That is a terrible animation. It is quite misleading - directly on the point that's being made - which is that, as the Moon orbits the Earth, so does the Earth orbit the Moon.

Better:
mass_center_inferior.gif

That centre cross is called the barycentre.

Picture a grown man in a whirling dance with a small child. The child "orbits" the grown man as they spin about a centre of rotation. But the grown man is not so much heavier than the child that he is stationary. He too orbits, but his orbit is quite small. It is smaller in a ratio related to the difference in their masses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
this is what i acctually wanted to say as the main reason why both don't collide.this is the wobbling effect i was talkin' abt..
 
prashantjha said:
this is what i acctually wanted to say as the main reason why both don't collide.this is the wobbling effect i was talkin' abt..
Well, frankly it was kind of inaccurate.

This is not true:
prashantjha said:
they wobble in a way in which when the moon approches Earth by the nearest distance,the Earth wobbles and hence kepps it away from the moon.
In fact, when the Moon makes its closest approach to the Earth, the Earth is likewise making its closest approach to the Moon. It's not like it "wobbles" out of the way.
 
  • #10
The moon is in fact going away, about 3cm year.

There is no "wobbling effect", as the moon and the Earth attracts each other the only thing that prevents they to hit is the momentum, more or less when you lance a basket ball in the basket and it almost enters and rotate a few times before goes away. (just for visualization sake not for the forces involved)

And Dave your gif was much more accurate thanks for sharing.
 
  • #11
ah,dave can you please explain elaborately,in which part I'm wrong.this will also help me!
 
  • #12
I don't think you're wrong, but the use of the word "wobble" has confused some people I think. It's a really vague word!
 
  • #13
prashantjha said:
ah,dave can you please explain elaborately,in which part I'm wrong.this will also help me!
Mikey said it.

There is no such well-defined term as wobble. Using it does not shed any light on why the Earth does not collide with the Moon.

Though he says he doesn't think you're wrong, I'd say you're not even wrong, since it cannot be deduced what you are trying to describe to even determine whether it is correct or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K