What type of filter should I use to fix my microwave filter problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter waht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter Microwave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and optimization of microwave filters, specifically focusing on bandpass filters at 3.2 GHz. Participants share their experiences with various filter types, including interdigital, cavity, and microstrip filters, and explore challenges related to tuning, bandwidth, and impedance matching.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes building prototypes of different filter types, noting that while the cavity and interdigital filters perform adequately, they exhibit undesirable responses at higher frequencies.
  • Another participant suggests that odd harmonics may significantly affect the cavity filter's performance and recommends considering multiple stages, such as a low-pass filter, to improve the overall response.
  • A different participant questions the tuning capabilities of the microstrip filter and proposes that minor adjustments, like shaving copper, could help tune it, depending on the available equipment for testing.
  • A detailed description of the cavity filter's construction is provided, highlighting its tuning mechanism and performance issues at higher frequencies, with a suggestion that adding a low-pass filter might be a solution.
  • One participant mentions the potential use of voltage-dependent capacitance from a reverse-biased diode to enhance filter performance across multiple octaves, which is a novel idea for some participants.
  • Another participant agrees that a transmission line on FR4 can function as a low-pass filter and identifies impedance matching as a root problem affecting performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the effectiveness of different filter designs and tuning methods, with no clear consensus on the best approach or solution to the challenges presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their designs, such as difficulties in tuning microstrip filters and issues with impedance matching that may affect performance. There is also mention of the dependence on specific construction techniques and materials.

waht
Messages
1,502
Reaction score
4
I'm working on a bandpass filter at 3.2 GHz. I built a few prototypes interdigital, pipecap cavity, and even microstrip.

Microstrip filter sort of works but it can't be tuned, so I abandoned it.

The other types also work, bandwidth and insertion loss is ok but they all exhibit garbage responses from 6 to 20 GHz, with some peaks having similar insertion than the fundemental.

So I'm looking for a way to either build a new type of filter, (mechanically tuned) or match impedance or something. This is pretty much a homebrew design.

Appreciate any info.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How did you do the cavity type filter? If you are building it how I think you are then the odd harmonics of the fundamental will have a significant response. In any case you will probably have to do multiple stages such as a low-pass after the first bandpass. Some interesting things can be achieved using transmission line stubs
 
I'm no expert at these frequencies (yet), but it sure seems like the microstrip could be tuned. What properties of the microstrip determine its filter characteristics? If it's a homebrew circuit and tuning, can't you do a little shaving of the copper to tune it? What are you using in the tuning process (do you have access to a network analyzer?)?
 
Cavity filter is basically a 1.5" copper pipe cap soldered to a FR4 pc board, with two SMA UT141 jumpers inserted into the cavity making a capacitive coupling by 1/8" probes extending from the jumpers. The cavity is tuned with a screw.

This is a common design popular among hams. Like this one

http://www.czd.org.uk/astro/radioastro/filter/index.html

I found that it works beautifully at the frequency of interest, but as you go up a couple of octaves in frequency, really bad things start to happen. Spikes up and down, as if it was acting like a high pass filter.


Same thing with my homebrew 5 element interdigital filter, that is enclosed in metal box, works great at the my frequency, but higher it looks so ugly.

Microstip filter that I did, I was close to my frequency, but to my surprise no other response was detected through 20 gigs. But I found even if you are millimeter off, it deteriorates and I am unable to optimize it. It's very difficult to tune it, even by taking bits of the trace. I think microstrips are good when designed by an em cad.

For tuning I just use a sweep oscillator and a diode detector, crude approach, but it's a homebrew so I don't complain.

I think a simple solution would be to add a low pass filter, but it's just as difficult, I think it has to do with band impedance matching, I don't know how to intergrate a stub or something.

thanks
 
what said:
Cavity filter is basically a 1.5" copper pipe cap soldered to a FR4 pc board, with two SMA UT141 jumpers inserted into the cavity making a capacitive coupling by 1/8" probes extending from the jumpers. The cavity is tuned with a screw.

This is a common design popular among hams. Like this one

http://www.czd.org.uk/astro/radioastro/filter/index.html

I found that it works beautifully at the frequency of interest, but as you go up a couple of octaves in frequency, really bad things start to happen.

Good stuff, what. But you won't find a physical filter that works over several ocatves, unless you use the voltage dependent capacitance of a reverse biased diode. Have you tried adding that to your physical GHz filters?
 
interesting point, I've never seen a diode used to aid the response of filters. I found out, that a transmission line on FR4 works as a good low pass filter through 6 or 7 GHz. So I think I will go with that.

But the root of the problem is bad impedance match I guess.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K