What type of person succeeds in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Type
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpersonal dynamics within the field of physics and how they compare to other scientific disciplines. Participants note that interactions among physicists, professors, and graduate students are similar to those in engineering and other sciences, highlighting the diversity of personalities encountered. Key factors for success in physics include diligence, achievement, integrity, and a high level of intelligence. Persistence is emphasized as crucial, with the notion that giving up easily can hinder success. The conversation also touches on the idea that a physicist could transition to other careers, such as sanitation, underscoring the versatility of skills acquired in physics. Passion for the subject is highlighted as essential, especially given the challenges of securing permanent positions in the field.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Does a particular personality work well in the society of physicists? Aside from the obvious intellectual skills, how does one achieve interpersonally in the field? When interacting with colleagues, are there any differences to other sciences?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loren Booda said:
Does a particular personality work well in the society of physicists? Aside from the obvious intellectual skills, how does one achieve interpersonally in the field? When interacting with colleagues, are there any differences to other sciences?
From personal experience, interaction with people (professors, grad students, . . .) in physics is no different that interacting with people in engineering or other sciences. My interaction with physicists has been the same as interacting with those in other sciences and engineering.

However, in interacting with people, one finds there are a variety of peronalities. Some are very open while others are not. Some people are great mentors while others are not.

The idea though is for one to find those people with whom one can form a collegial relationship, and one's success will be based upon one's diligence, achievement and integrity.
 
And being really really smart. Smarter than me.
 
You have to be persistant. If you give up easily you will never make it.
 
And even persistence is no guarantee, only your heart can be master. It is easier to be a physicist and become a trash man then vice versa.
 
denverdoc said:
And even persistence is no guarantee, only your heart can be master. It is easier to be a physicist and become a trash man then vice versa.

What do you mean trash man? Like a garbage man that knows advanced physics?? Or like the character from good will hunting that is a construction worker?
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see that. :smile:
 
mathPimpDaddy said:
What do you mean trash man? Like a garbage man that knows advanced physics?? Or like the character from good will hunting that is a construction worker?
Only what I said, if one is a physicist, he or she could likeky push a mop, with enough training. To sweep a near object from danger might require the skills of both.
 
mathPimpDaddy said:
What do you mean trash man? Like a garbage man that knows advanced physics?? Or like the character from good will hunting that is a construction worker?

I think he is referring to Dilbert's sanitation engineer, the world's smartest garbage-man.
 
  • #10
Engineer also is a physicist ~
 
  • #11
Integral said:
You have to be persistant. If you give up easily you will never make it.
Sure, I think it is even more about being passionated with physics. Thinking that you could much more money by doing something else than physics makes it difficult to put up with the fact that getting a permanent position may take a very long time.
 
Back
Top