What Types of Potential Energy Exist Beyond Gravitational?

Click For Summary
Potential energy encompasses various forms beyond just gravitational potential energy, including elastic, chemical, electric, and nuclear potential energy. The discussion clarifies that potential energy is energy stored due to an object's position within a force field, and it is part of the broader category of mechanical energy, which is the sum of potential and kinetic energies. However, chemical energy, while a type of potential energy, is often not classified as mechanical energy due to its quantum nature. The conversation also highlights the distinction between conservative forces, which store energy, and non-conservative forces, which dissipate energy. Ultimately, the consensus is that all forms of energy can be related to mechanical energy in some context, but the terminology can lead to confusion.
  • #31


There in only nuclear, electromagnetic and gravitational.

All mechanical potential energy is electromagnetic (stress, chemical) or gravitational (water wheel etc.)

Elastic can be a mix of the two. When you hang a bowling ball on a bungee cord it's gravitational PE that went into elastic (electromagnetic.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


Isn't mechanical energy just the addition of kinetic energy and potential energy? This definition doesn't imply the potential energy has to be chemical, electrostatic, etc. Seems like just a name to me.
 
  • #33


Potential energy always has a source force field (nuclear/gravitational/electromagnetic). When we say that work is done, we should remember that it is only a mathematical quantity which is so defined that it can be equated with the change in Kinetic Energy.

The expressions ∫F.ds can be obtained from 1/2mv2 in conservative force field.

When mechanical energy changes into thermal energy, we have to introduce J as multiplicative factor to obtain the heat generated. But in that case too we say that kinetic energy transforms into thermal energy. Actually they are shown to be equal by some transformation rule.
If you hit a thing by a hammer, the Kinetic energy of hammer sets the air in motion and we hear a sound. The energy is still mechanical.
 
  • #34


PhanthomJay are all energies mechanical?
 
  • #35


Somenath said:
Potential energy always has a source force field (nuclear/gravitational/electromagnetic). When we say that work is done, we should remember that it is only a mathematical quantity which is so defined that it can be equated with the change in Kinetic Energy.

The expressions ∫F.ds can be obtained from 1/2mv2 in conservative force field.

When mechanical energy changes into thermal energy, we have to introduce J as multiplicative factor to obtain the heat generated. But in that case too we say that kinetic energy transforms into thermal energy. Actually they are shown to be equal by some transformation rule.
If you hit a thing by a hammer, the Kinetic energy of hammer sets the air in motion and we hear a sound. The energy is still mechanical.

Whats ur point?
 
  • #36
I-copeland said:
PhanthomJay are all energies mechanical?
No. But when any type of energy ...be it chemical, nuclear, or (heaven forbid) mechanical energy (definition 2)...is transferred into or out of the system, it changes the mechanical energy (definition 1) of the system. This follows from conservation of energy law, dE + dU + dK = 0, where dE represents the energy transferred into or out of the system from work done by non-conservative forces.
 
  • #37


i don't understand.
Basically I've heard chemical energy is classified potential and so i want to know (following logic) if it is mechanical and if not then the this could cause the Professor of Logic to spit out his drink.
 
Last edited:
  • #38


Chemical energy libeated in a reaction is equivalent to the change in Potential energy due to the force of attraction among the atoms.
 
  • #39


I-copeland said:
Whats ur point?

I mean the transformation relations between Potential and other energies are so designed that they seem to be equal.
 
  • #40


Somenath said:
I mean the transformation relations between Potential and other energies are so designed that they seem to be equal.

I see, well I'm not inquiring if they're equal but if the energetic classification for chemical energy is mechanical? Jolly good.
 
  • #41


Energy is energy is energy? It's all the same concept, just manifests itself in different phenomenons, right?
 
  • #42


Somenath said:
Chemical energy libeated in a reaction is equivalent to the change in Potential energy due to the force of attraction among the atoms.

So it is mechanical...
 
  • #43


Woopydalan said:
Energy is energy is energy? It's all the same concept, just manifests itself in different phenomenons, right?

U call yourself a scientist!??
 
  • #44


No, I'm actually curious about the answer to your question, but I'm just basing my idea strictly on the definitions provided by wikipedia and how I interpret them. I have pondered myself as to what mechanical energy is, and this is what is provided:

''In physics, mechanical energy is the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy present in the components of a mechanical system.''

Now, this statement doesn't give any definition as to what a mechanical system is, so I wikipedia that and find:

''A mechanical system manages power to accomplish a task that involves forces and movement''

Ok, so in all the previous phenomenon discussed (chemical energy, electrical energy, etc) there are forces involved and movement, so I am prone to believe, based strictly on these definitions, that they (chemical or electrical phenomenon) are also mechanical systems. If someone reputable is able to tell me otherwise, I am all ears. That is why I joined this discussion, whether to confirm my thoughts or for them to be ripped to shreds is indifferent to me as long as I learn what it actually means.
 
  • #45


dude! me to.
 
  • #46


Woopydalan said:
Ok, so in all the previous phenomenon discussed (chemical energy, electrical energy, etc) there are forces involved and movement, so I am prone to believe, based strictly on these definitions, that they (chemical or electrical phenomenon) are also mechanical systems
When we talk about 'mechanical energy' we usually mean energy due to an object's motion (kinetic energy) and position (potential energy). The kinetic energy meant here is macroscopic kinetic energy--due to the object's motion as a whole, not its internal molecular motion. Similarly, the potential energy included in 'mechanical energy' is due to the object's macroscopic position--it excludes all sorts of internal energy such as chemical energy.
 
  • #47


So mechanical energy is used to describe only what its name implies, mascroscopic objects? No electrons for electrical energy (because the electrons do have mass)?
 
  • #48


Woopydalan said:
So mechanical energy is used to describe only what its name implies, mascroscopic objects?
Usually, yes. But it depends on the context.
No electrons for electrical energy (because the electrons do have mass)?
When the electron is the object, then you can consider its electrostatic potential energy (when with another charged particle) as part of the mechanical energy of the system.

But if your system is a ball throw up in the air, then all that matters is its macroscopic kinetic energy and the gravitational PE when considering its mechanical energy. (At least that is the usual context.)
 
  • #49


Woopydalan said:
So mechanical energy is used to describe only what its name implies, mascroscopic objects? No electrons for electrical energy (because the electrons do have mass)?

In any macroscopic non-electrical machine the electrons are too small to matter, so any energy they have isn't included. In electrical machines, which specifically deal with moving electrons, this is obviously different. For mechanical energy, think in terms of classical machines and what we build from them. Something like a clock that uses a pendulum and weights is pure mechanical energy, no electrical or chemical.
 
  • #50


So u get "macroscopic mechanical energy" and "microscopic mechanical energy"?
 
  • #51


where did everyone go :(
 
  • #52


I-copeland said:
where did everyone go :(

Nowhere.
 
  • #53
Drakkith said:
Nowhere.
Which is the same place this thread is going.
 
  • #54


Copeland, there is no "exact answer". Could you consider an electron to have mechanical energy? Sure, in the right context and as long as you make it clear that's what you are doing.
 
  • #55


hmmm well i wanted to connect different levels of mechanical energy to the the different levels of the energy hierarchy (entropy).
 
  • #56


I-copeland said:
hmmm well i wanted to connect different levels of mechanical energy to the the different levels of the energy hierarchy (entropy).

I see no reason you cannot do this. Just realize that it probably won't be as "exact" as you were hoping.
 
  • #57


Mechanical energy requires organization. It is part of a mechanical system in which power management accomplishes a task. Energy may be stored in systems without being present as matter, or as kinetic or electromagnetic energy. But until an outside force utilizes potential energy, mechanical energy will not exist. Refer to the laws of conservation of energy.
 
  • #58


seems like ur saying potential energy isn't mechanical :(
 
  • #59


I-copeland said:
seems like ur saying potential energy isn't mechanical :(

From wikipedia:
In physics, mechanical energy is the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy present in the components of a mechanical system.

I think that sums it up. If you stick to that you can't go wrong.
 
  • #60


Mechanical energy is not potential energy. It is the conduit or storage of energy of a system with a set task. As it is present in the system, only after the conversion of potential energy, is it referred to as mechanical. Drakkith is correct. Notice the part that says "components of a mechanical system".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K