What Types of Potential Energy Exist Beyond Gravitational?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the various types of potential energy, confirming that potential energy encompasses gravitational, elastic, chemical, electric, and nuclear forms. Participants agree that potential energy is a subset of mechanical energy, which is defined as the sum of potential and kinetic energies. The conversation highlights the distinction between mechanical energy in classical physics and its broader interpretations, emphasizing that chemical energy, while related to potential energy, is not strictly mechanical. The consensus is that all forms of energy ultimately relate back to mechanical energy in some context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mechanical energy, including potential and kinetic energy
  • Familiarity with types of forces: conservative and non-conservative
  • Basic knowledge of energy forms: gravitational, elastic, chemical, electric, and nuclear
  • Concept of energy conservation in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definitions and applications of conservative and non-conservative forces
  • Explore the relationship between potential energy and work done in physical systems
  • Study the implications of energy transformations in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the role of chemical energy in thermodynamics and its relation to mechanical energy
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy types and their applications in mechanical systems.

  • #61


FissX said:
Mechanical energy is not potential energy. It is the conduit or storage of energy of a system with a set task. As it is present in the system, only after the conversion of potential energy, is it referred to as mechanical. Drakkith is correct. Notice the part that says "components of a mechanical system".
You seem to be saying that potential energy is not mechanical energy, which is incorrect. Please refer to the wiki definition quoted by Drakkith. There really isn't much more to it. It's just a term of convenience.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62


There is a difference between potential energy existing IN mechanical energy and potential energy actually BEING mechanical energy. They are not one in the same. Mechanical energy cannot exist without potential energy. But potential energy can exist without mechanical energy.

Because I send electricity into a copper wire (example) does not mean the copper wire is also the source of energy. It is a conduit with which potential energy is stored (short version). Mechanical energy is the "copper wire" in the sense that it is an organized mechanical system with a set task.
 
  • #63


FissX said:
There is a difference between potential energy existing IN mechanical energy and potential energy actually BEING mechanical energy. They are not one in the same. Mechanical energy cannot exist without potential energy. But potential energy can exist without mechanical energy.

Because I send electricity into a copper wire (example) does not mean the copper wire is also the source of energy. It is a conduit with which potential energy is stored (short version). Mechanical energy is the "copper wire" in the sense that it is an organized mechanical system with a set task.
I have no idea what you think 'mechanical energy' is or what you are trying to say.

Try this: Toss a ball into the air. Define the mechanical energy of the system. Is it conserved? Why or why not?
 
  • #64


FissX said:
There is a difference between potential energy existing IN mechanical energy and potential energy actually BEING mechanical energy. They are not one in the same. Mechanical energy cannot exist without potential energy. But potential energy can exist without mechanical energy.

Because I send electricity into a copper wire (example) does not mean the copper wire is also the source of energy. It is a conduit with which potential energy is stored (short version). Mechanical energy is the "copper wire" in the sense that it is an organized mechanical system with a set task.

I don't believe that would be mechanical energy, but electrical energy. Furthermore, given the definition of mechanical energy, I don't agree with your view that potential energy isn't mechanical energy. It doesn't HAVE to be mechanical energy, but it is part of it when appropriate.
 
  • #65


Is there a simple way to understand the logic of the sequence of the energetic quality hierarchy?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K