What Unique Insights Can We Uncover from Folding@Home Statistics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rage Spectate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Insights Stats
Rage Spectate
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My friend and I have begun work on a folding at home statistics site.

I'm going to break F@H down for you all real quick.
Every 3 hours a Team submits more points and "Units" to their total points and Unit count. (The unit is where the points come from). So every 3 hours Point and Unit totals grow for each unique team.
A team consists of Users who submits the points and units that a team unites under one ID.
That is to say, User 1 and User 2 submit 4 units each to Team 1 and then Team 1 logs 8 Units.


If you want more details as to what F@H is: http://folding.stanford.edu/

There are a few stat sites already in existence and they can be found here:

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_list.php?s=
http://kakaostats.com/

Most of the stat sites that I know track very basic statistics such as average daily submission amount per team/user. Or things such as how much an individual is expected to have in a year.

It's all pretty basic, and you can see more on the sites I provided.

So what I'm hoping you all can provide me with is really cool ideas on some stuff my friend and I can do with these stats. I have taken only an intro. stat class which has yielded a few ideas we might use but I haven't, nor has my friend, taken any advanced stat classes. Albiet, my friend, who happens to be doing all the back-end "math coding" is a veritable math whiz. If you can just name some advanced stat topics and what it would yield I'm sure he could look it up and code some stuff to go on the site.

So please don't hold back your recommendations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does anyone have any recommendations?

I'm not asking for how to do it but just names of topics in the area.
 
A good start would be to find interesting ways to visualize various aspects of the data (rather than just a table of numbers).
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top