What was Einstein's Unification Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on seeking resources related to Einstein's unification theory, particularly focusing on where he went wrong and the mathematics involved. Participants recommend several academic resources, including a historical overview by Hubert F. M. Goenner and a book by Vaclav Hlavaty on the geometry of Einstein's theory. Additionally, a link to a modern mathematician's website is shared for further insights. The conversation briefly veers off-topic with a mention of metaphysics, which is later dismissed. Overall, the thread emphasizes the challenge of finding comprehensive materials on Einstein's unification theory.
kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
Just wondered if anyone had any good links or recommended books on Einstein's unification theory. I've tried searching the web but usually all that pops up was that his theory was a failure. My interest is where exactly he went wrong & perhaps even some of his mathematics. I figure the mathematics will probably be harder to find, so even a general idea on what he was working on would be greatly apperciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a book that might be in some academic libraries: Vaclav Hlavaty, Geometry of Einstein's Unified Field Theory, P Noordhof Ltd., Groningen, 1958.

I can't resist adding this website: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jashiffl/einstein-schrodinger.html , by a modern mathematician who works on the theory.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sorry to be late to reply bro.

according to wikipedia, this is the definition of metaphysics -
Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy concerned with explaining the nature of the world. It is the study of being or reality.[1] It addresses questions such as: What is the nature of reality? Is there a God? What is man's place in the universe?
 
please ignore my post.. that was a wrong window .. my bad, i apologize
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top