News What were the consequences of Israel's attack on the Gaza Aid Flotilla?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TubbaBlubba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ship
Click For Summary
A group of peace advocates attempted to deliver humanitarian supplies to Gaza via a convoy, which was intercepted by the Israeli military in international waters. The IDF's response resulted in significant injuries and fatalities among the activists, raising accusations of state terrorism against Israel. The incident has sparked intense debate, with some arguing that the activists provoked the confrontation intentionally for media attention, while others condemn Israel's military actions as excessive and unjustified. The Israeli government had previously offered to allow the supplies to be inspected and delivered through its ports, which the convoy organizers refused. The situation has drawn international criticism, particularly regarding the humanitarian impact of Israel's blockade on Gaza, and has heightened tensions, especially with Turkey, which has expressed outrage over the incident. The legality of Israel's actions is contested, with arguments surrounding international law and the enforcement of blockades. The discussion reflects deep divisions over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the complexities of humanitarian efforts in a militarized context.
  • #91
TubbaBlubba said:
And the two jews? They were suicidal, I suppose? Maybe their hatred for their kinsmen fueled it?

Probably.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
He's become less extreme these days. But yes, he's a member of what you'd call the "intellectual left" in Sweden. Perhaps somewhat odd in certain views, but not violent extremists.

As opposed to the slightly-less-intellectual left, consisting of antifascist and other happy brick throwers.


No, I find it hard to see this as some sort of violent death convoy. Perhaps time will clear things up.
 
  • #93
Geigerclick said:
..And who killed Yitzak Rabin?

A right-wing radical.

These are nearly all left-wingers, in case it wasn't clear enough. The Israel-Palestina conflict is one of the by far most prominent issues the left focuses on. (that is, the socialist party and the like, not the measly left we have in our parliament)
 
  • #94
TubbaBlubba said:
A right-wing radical.

These are nearly all left-wingers, in case it wasn't clear enough. The Israel-Palestina conflict is one of the by far most prominent issues the left focuses on. (that is, the socialist party and the like, not the measly left we have in our parliament)

My point is that being Jewish doesn't somehow immunize you from being on the extreme right, OR THE LEFT.
 
  • #95
Well, personally, I've got far too conflicting views of this at the moment. I think I'll have to step back and see what it looks like once things clear up.

Geiger: I thought your point was that the people on the boat were all muslim extremists? Doesn't seem to be the case to me, and this is why it confuses me.
 
  • #96
TubbaBlubba said:
And the two jews? They were suicidal, I suppose? Maybe their hatred for their kinsmen fueled it?

We (Israel) have a problem, out nature is too soft and peaceful =)
But some take it to the unhealthy extreme bordering with self destruction.
 
  • #97
I would also please see people refrain from using statements like "evil", "death cult" or the like. It only serves to demonize and dehumanize people, and is meaningless in an actual discussion.
 
  • #98
arildno said:
By posting these you're making the point that having access to all this information beforehand did not stop IDF from dangling a momentarily defenseless soldier from a helicopter into what they claim to be a lynch mob.

At that point the singular soldier is in mortal peril and has no option but use deadly force against the mob.

Something doesn't add up.
 
  • #99
EnumaElish said:
By posting these you're making the point that having access to all this information beforehand did not stop IDF from dangling a momentarily defenseless soldier from a helicopter into what they claim to be a lynch mob.

At that point the singular soldier is in mortal peril and has no option but use deadly force against the mob.

Something doesn't add up.

Yes, this is another thing that confuses me. As I mentioned before, Israel's practice is surrounding suspected terrorist vessels with naval force, using torpedoes (or similar weaponry) to immobilize them, pouring a special oil on the ship making it impossible to keep your balance on, and THEN boarding the ship with troops wearing special shoes allowing them to walk on the surface.
 
  • #100
EnumaElish said:
By posting these you're making the point that having access to all this information beforehand did not stop IDF from dangling a momentarily defenseless soldier from a helicopter into what they claim to be a lynch mob.

At that point the singular soldier is in mortal peril and has no option but use deadly force against the mob.

Something doesn't add up.

Hmm..and why should IDF ASSUME that everyone on those boats wouldn't have their courage faltering once they had a real face-down?

1 out of 6 boat-crews were bent upon this type of altercation.

The other boats responded responsibly.
 
  • #101
TubbaBlubba said:
I would also please see people refrain from using statements like "evil", "death cult" or the like. It only serves to demonize and dehumanize people, and is meaningless in an actual discussion.
The man is self-demonizing, and doesn't need my assistance in de-humanizing himself.

He has already mutilated himself into this horror, years ago.

And no, it never hurts to actually know your..enemy.

It is, in fact, crucial.
 
  • #102
TubbaBlubba said:
Doesn't exactly look like they're "protecting the blockade" here...

(referring to a map showing the ships opposite Tel Aviv, but three times the distance of israeli territorial waters)

You asked this question before, despite the fact that I had specifically dealt with it in my post which you claimed to be reading …
TubbaBlubba said:
EDIT: Hold on, reading through tiny-tim's post. Also doing some further research before commenting.

Interesting. Would "Breaching a blockade" constitute any vessel reaching harbor?

… and I replied by quoting from that post …
tiny-tim said:
"Breaching or attempting to breach a blockade" includes heading towards the blockade area with the declared intention of entering it …

which certainly includes these ships. :smile:

This was from
tiny-tim said:
A ship is "attempting to breach a blockade" even before it reaches the declared blockade area … see for example paragraph 7.7.4 of the U.S.A.'s "[URL
Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations[/URL] …
7.7.4. … Attempted breach of blockade occurs from the time a vessel or
aircraft leaves a port or airfield with the intention of evading the blockade …

I could also have repeated that Paragraph 146 of the San Remo document specifically allows capture of ships in international waters (ie outside "neutral waters", which means waters of a neutral country) …
146. Neutral merchant vessels are subject to capture outside neutral waters if they …
(f) are breaching or attempting to breach a blockade.

Since the occupants of all the ships had publicly declared their intention of breaching the blockade, then (since after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refused to stop) international law entitled the Israelis to capture it anywhere along its route.

To use your words, it certainly does 'look like the Israelis were "protecting the blockade".'

Please don't raise this issue again as if it hasn't been answered. :frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #103
I was referring to the fact that they were, at least from my perspective, very far from the blockade. But maybe that's standard; Naval warfare is as you have noticed not one of my areas of expertise.
 
  • #104
Office_Shredder said:
The last time someone tried to blockade Israel we got the Six Day war. A Turkish blockade would certainly trigger total war between the two countries. A country would have to be insane to invite that kind of violence because of an incident like this

Yes, but then other actions are possible. NATO has already condemned the Israeli action, so you can well imagine NATO supplying Gaza with goods that Israel won't currently let through.
 
  • #105
Geigerclick said:
We (the USA) intercept ships en route to Iran and NK, and from them under this same law. Note the lack of international outrage. The issue here is poor PR on the behalf of the Israelis, and a successful stunt on the other side. The condemnation of Israel has become so trite and tired at this point that it is hard to take it seriously anymore.

Lets make this simple, this is the international equivalent of tossing puppies under a bus, catching it on camera, and generating outrage against the bus-driver.


No ships are intercepted in international waters by the US except for Somali pirate ships. Ships from North Korea have been inspected when they wanted to re-supply. Intercepting an Iranian or North Korean ship in international waters would likely trigger a war that no one wants.
 
  • #106
I'm listening to the press conference by the aforementioned politician.

According to him;
- The blockade is illegal (He quoted Amnesty on this).
- The boarding was illegal (I can't comment on from what stance he makes this view).
- The Israeli army tried to (apparently unsuccessfully) seize their passports.
- This was intended as nothing but non-violent resistance, and they had received training in non-violence before departure
- They had not made any sort of violent resistance (on his boat) and they had entered via hooks
- He claimed to have read several Israeli newspapers online condemning these actions.

So what I wonder is, what happened on the boat that did apparently make violent resistance?
 
  • #107
Geigerclick said:
We have caused such ships to turn back, or used proxies (such as Israel!) to board them. We nearly caused a nuclear holocaust because of a blockade once, remember? Something to do with Cuba... :rolleyes:

Come on, let's be intellectually honest here.

I wouldn't call the US much of an example in terms of military action, anyway...

Geigerclick said:
According to him... so... who cares? According to the IDF this boat was a threat to national security, and according to IHH this was a group of peace-loving neo-hippies. Doubtless both are not correct.

I'm not going to make a statement on the validity of his claims, I am merely quoting a retelling of a first-hand experience. I thought it might be of interest to SOMEONE?
 
  • #108
TubbaBlubba said:
… Naval warfare is as you have noticed not one of my areas of expertise.

Nor mine … I'm a freshwater fish.

But it doesn't stop either you or me from looking it up on google instead of just making up international law the way we would like it to be. :frown:
 
  • #109
tiny-tim said:
Nor mine … I'm a freshwater fish.

But it doesn't stop either you or me from looking it up on google instead of just making up international law the way we would like it to be. :frown:

I was basing my stance on the matter from what I had heard from several sources (mainly news stations here in Sweden) which all implied or outright stated that the boarding is illegal. Why this conflicts with the apparent law is not something I can judge.

Geiger: Now, now, now, the US "saving" Europe from the Nazis, eh? That's something for an entirely different topic...
 
  • #110
What if the group at hand was the Klu Klux Klan, or the Jim Jones mass suicide (or mass homicide) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown" , Khaibar, oh Jews!") and twisted manipulation of a major religion and that of the Klan's, and that there's little difference between the Jihadist's cult-like embrace of death and that of Jim Jone's followers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #111
Geigerclick said:
Save or not, our military efficacy at that time, and previously was high. For the prior statement you can and SHOULD do what the bright fish suggests (freshwater, I LOL'ed at that) and do the research so that you no longer base your views on the statements of politicians. The laws are available to peruse, and they are not terribly ambiguous.

Base my views on the statements of politicians? No, several independent news sources. Don't make a straw man of me.
 
  • #112
What I wonder is where the boat that ended up doing violent resistance happens to fit into this. From what I can see, at least MOST of them went there with non-violence in mind. Did the wrong people end up on the same boat, inciting each other? Was it planned before that that boat would make violent resistance? It doesn't add up to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #113
As for the so-called humanitarian plight of the Palestinians, it is largely...non-existent.

IF conditions had been so horrible there, this should show itself on a number of statistics.

I will use data from IndexMundi here, W meaning "West Bank", "G" Gaza, "S": Syria, E: Egypt, C: China, T: Turkey.

1. Infant mortality rate (per 1000):
W: 15.96, G:18.35, S: 16.69 , T: 25.78, E: 27.26, C: 20.25

2. Life expectancy at birth (in years):
W: 74.54, G: 73.42, S: 74.22, T: 71.96, E: 72.12, C: 73.47

3. Death rate (per 1000)
W: 3.66, G: 3.44, S: 3.72, T: 6.1, E: 4.88, C: 7.06

All numbers should be 2009-estimates.
http://www.indexmundi.com

The low death rates are consistent with that in W&G, most people are young, AND that the vast majority of persons there die of old age, rather than from anything else.

(Norway has an aging population, with a 9.29 death rate, and 3.58 infant mortality rate.)
 
Last edited:
  • #114
Count Iblis said:
No ships are intercepted in international waters by the US except for Somali pirate ships. Ships from North Korea have been inspected when they wanted to re-supply. Intercepting an Iranian or North Korean ship in international waters would likely trigger a war that no one wants.
I believe you are mistaken. I believe the US has stopped and sunk NK ships in international waters bound for Iran, though I can't reference cases.
 
  • #115
Geigerclick said:
Heh, of course if the KKK had done one thousandth of what Jihadis had in the Middle East,
I would not be so fast to minimize the KKK over the length US history. It claimed maybe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan#Urbanization" of the US population in the 1920s, including many nationally prominent politicians.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #116
the Stockholm defence

TubbaBlubba said:
I was basing my stance on the matter from what I had heard from several sources (mainly news stations here in Sweden) which all implied or outright stated that the boarding is illegal.

Since when were Swedish news stations unbiased?

And since when were Swedish news presenters experts on international law?

And they're hardly independent …

i] news stations tend to copy each other

ii] when they're not doing that, they tend to copy from the same sources.

Anyway, are you seriously pleading a new "Stockholm defence" …

"I was relying on Swedish news stations"?
 
  • #117
TubbaBlubba said:
Or what if the jews had been nazis? I think that there's a striking resemblance between the conditions they force the Gaza people to live in and the work camps of Nazi Germany.
...

Some people just have no idea what they talking about...
It seems to me you more interested in controversy rather then debate...
 
  • #118
Geigerclick said:
...
Lets make this simple, this is the international equivalent of tossing puppies under a bus, catching it on camera, and generating outrage against the bus-driver.

This one converges to reality very fast...
 
  • #119
the Stockholm defence

TubbaBlubba said:
I think that there's a striking resemblance between the conditions they force the Gaza people to live in and the work camps of Nazi Germany.

Did you get that from Swedish news stations also?

Those Swedish news stations really are racist, then …

there's no comparison between Gaza and Nazi "work camps". :mad:
 
  • #120


tiny-tim said:
Did you get that from Swedish news stations also?

Those Swedish news stations really are racist, then …

there's no comparison between Gaza and Nazi "work camps". :mad:

Especially when the unemployment rate there was...40% in 2009..(in my previous post, I have some other stats from indexmundi)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 126 ·
5
Replies
126
Views
17K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
17K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
21K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
12K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
10K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 490 ·
17
Replies
490
Views
40K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K