MHB What will the profit be if 1500 units are sold next year?

Simon T
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
the first year of operation for a small company yielded a loss of \$5000. The company has \$15,000 per year tied up in fixed costs and spent 40,000 on raw materials and labour. Since the company was not well known, they were only able to sell 500 units of their product that year. It is hoped that business with improve next year and that 1500 units will be sold at the same selling price as last year.

a) If 1500 units are sold next year, what will the profit be?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Profit is revenue less costs. There is a fixed cost of 15000 and a marginal cost of 80...if we denote the price of each unit as $p$ and the number of units sold as $x$, then our profit function $P$ is:

$$P(p,x)=px-\left(80x+15000\right)=(p-80)x-15000$$

Now, we are given:

$$P(p,500)=(p-80)500-15000=-5000$$

So, what is $p$?
 
I was taught a different way for this module. I was taught to have a chart with Unit basis and total amount at the top and on the left side we have s, vc, cm, fc, and np and we fill in the numbers.
 
Well, you're in for a treat then, as I'm going to help you answer this question in a much easier and more straightforward manner using a little algebra. (Yes)

Once you find $p$, then you will have the profit function in one variable $x$, into which you can simply plug the given value of $x$ to output the profit for that production level. No time consuming charts, graphs and/or tables required. (Bow)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top