What Would Happen if Our Sun Became a Pulsar?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Algaib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulsar Sun
AI Thread Summary
If our sun were replaced by a pulsar, the gravity would remain the same, preventing the solar system from being sucked in. The pulsar would emit significantly less visible light, primarily producing x-rays, and any observable strobe effect would depend on the pulsar's magnetic field orientation relative to Earth. While the immediate gravitational effects would not pull planets into the pulsar, their orbits could become unstable over millions to billions of years, potentially leading to collisions or ejections from the system. The evolutionary state and environment of the pulsar would influence its emission spectra. Overall, the dynamics of such a scenario would be complex and unpredictable.
Algaib
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If our sun was replaced by a pulsar, would our solar system be sucked into it because of the increased gravity? How long would it take? Would we burn up because of the increased heat? How long would it take? Does it still emit visable light or only x-rays etc..? Would the light on Earth be observed as a 'strobe'? (if the rotation of the pulsar was slow enough to see, say a few seconds.)
 
Space news on Phys.org
Our solar system would not be sucked in.
If the sun was replaced by a solar mass pulsar, the gravity would be exactly the same.

The pulsar's emission spectra would depend largely on its evolutionary state, surface temperature, and local environment. It would be (at least) significantly dimmer in the visual.

The strobes and level of x-ray emission would depend sensitively on the orientation of the pulsar's magnetic field axis to the orbital plane of the earth. Generally the magnetic field is perpendicular to the orbital plane, and thus we would not see (or be exposed) to the pulses.
 
What if you had a pulsar with much more mass than the sun, say enough to pull everything into it, how long would that process likely take? For Earth to fall in?
 
Things still wouldn't be pulled in, it would just change their orbits.
Its very possible the new configuration would be unstable however... and eventually some planets would collide with the sun, or others would be ejected from the system. There is no predictable amount of time that would take without doing the calculations. Most like between millions and billions of years.
 
Pulsar Effect on Planets Videos
http://www.google.com/search?source...ved=0CFsQqwQ&bav=on.1,or.&fp=e63e90ac70623278

One thing to keep in mind is that pulsars are rotating neutron stars resulting from supernova explosions. So any planets that were present at the time of that event were bathed in the resultant radiation. There are actually rocky planets that have been detected around a pulsar. Neutron star, PSR B1257+12, was the first. Here is an article concerning this.

Planets around pulsars:
http://www.astro.psu.edu/users/alex/pulsar_planets_text.html
 
Last edited:
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
what is the current status of the field for quantum cosmology, are there any observations that support any theory of quantum cosmology? is it just cosmology during the Planck era or does it extend past the Planck era. what are the leading candidates into research into quantum cosmology and which physics departments research it? how much respect does loop quantum cosmology has compared to string cosmology with actual cosmologists?
Back
Top