B What would need to be possible to make a cube of circles?

AI Thread Summary
A cube of circles is conceptually challenging due to the dimensional differences between three-dimensional cubes and two-dimensional circles. In topology, a sphere can represent an infinite collection of circles, suggesting a theoretical equivalence to a cube. However, traditional geometry, which involves measuring angles and lengths, cannot reconcile the roundness of circles with the edginess of cubes. Historical attempts to explore this concept date back to around 3000-2000 BC. The discussion also mentions the 3D Fourier transform of a square wave as a potential mathematical exploration of this idea.
SheldonCooper13
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
in what geometry would a cube of circles be possible
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Circular cubism?
 
  • Haha
Likes SammyS and berkeman
SheldonCooper13 said:
in what geometry would a cube of circles be possible
None that I can think of. A cube is a three-dimensional object, while circles are two-dimensional.
 
SheldonCooper13 said:
in what geometry would a cube of circles be possible
It is possible in topology where a sphere that can be considered as an infinite collection of circles is equivalent to a cube. Geometry means that we can measure angles and lengths. This makes it impossible to get something edgy out of something round.

Not that we haven't tried: (##\sim 3,000 - 2,000 \text{ BC}##)

d9GcReQEauioNj31F70jKoM3As9mate3FM5YC6z5prJFuzSQ&s.jpg
 
SheldonCooper13 said:
in what geometry would a cube of circles be possible
The 3D Fourier transform of a square wave.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Back
Top