What's a good calculus textbook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnyies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Textbook
AI Thread Summary
When selecting a calculus textbook for self-study, James Stewart's Calculus and Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry are popular options. Michael Spivak's Calculus is noted for its advanced, theoretical approach but only covers single-variable calculus. Courant's "Introduction to Calculus to Analysis" is recommended for its two volumes, with Volume 1 focusing on single-variable calculus and Volume 2 on multivariable calculus. Larson's Calculus is considered suitable for beginners, particularly for AP Calculus, while Spivak and Courant are better suited for those seeking a deeper theoretical understanding. However, Spivak's and Courant's texts are not comparable to Larson or Stewart, as the latter focus more on techniques and applications. There are concerns about the weak treatment of epsilon-delta proofs and continuity in many calculus textbooks, including Larson's. Overall, Larson's text is viewed as a reasonable choice for beginners wanting to grasp concepts and applications of calculus.
johnnyies
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
What's a good calculus textbook? Especially for self study. I've narrowed things down to James Stewart's Calculus and Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry.

Does anyone know if Michael Spivak's Calculus is only single variable, or does it include multivariable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michael Spivak's Calculus is an advanced book, more of an introduction to analysis textbook.

I'm currently using Larson's Calculus for my AP Calculus class, and it's not bad. If it boils down to Stewart vs. Larson, I'll go with Larson.
 
Spivak's Calculus covers only single variable calculus (but indeed at a higher, more theoretical level than a typical introduction).
 
thrill3rnit3 said:
Michael Spivak's Calculus is an advanced book, more of an introduction to analysis textbook.

I'm currently using Larson's Calculus for my AP Calculus class, and it's not bad. If it boils down to Stewart vs. Larson, I'll go with Larson.

Are you using Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry?

Anyways, how is Spivak's and Courant's texts compared to Larson or Stewart?
 
johnnyies said:
Are you using Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry?

Yes I am.

johnnyies said:
Anyways, how is Spivak's and Courant's texts compared to Larson or Stewart?

They're not even comparable. Larson and Stewart are general calculus books, aimed to teach the techniques and the applications of calculus.

Meanwhile, Spivak's and Courant's texts take it a step further - they delve into the theory side of things.

If you're just beginning to learn calculus, don't bother with Spivak's and Courant's just yet.
 
If by "Larson", you mean the Larson & Hostetler book on Calculus with Analytic Geometry, this is a good book. The weak topics are the epsilon-delta limit proofs and the study on continuity; otherwise should be a good book. Reasonable to learn from, for a beginner who wants to have concept understanding and learn to apply Calculus.
 
symbolipoint said:
If by "Larson", you mean the Larson & Hostetler book on Calculus with Analytic Geometry, this is a good book. The weak topics are the epsilon-delta limit proofs and the study on continuity; otherwise should be a good book. Reasonable to learn from, for a beginner who wants to have concept understanding and learn to apply Calculus.

Are the epsilon-delta proofs just generally weak in most calculus books? I though Thomas' Early Transcendentals didn't do so well explaining them.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
19K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top