What's the deal with force and velocity components?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concepts of force and velocity components in physics, particularly in the context of special relativity. It clarifies that while a force can be componentized along perpendicular axes, a force component cannot be further componentized independently. Additionally, it confirms that in special relativity, the only direction unaffected by length contraction is perpendicular to the velocity vector of an object, such as a spaceship moving diagonally. This understanding is crucial for grasping the implications of relativistic effects on both force and velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector decomposition in physics
  • Familiarity with special relativity principles
  • Knowledge of force components and their representation
  • Basic grasp of length contraction and time dilation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector decomposition techniques in physics
  • Explore the implications of special relativity on force and motion
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of length contraction
  • Investigate the relationship between velocity components and time dilation
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of force and velocity in the context of special relativity.

Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
I have two questions about components which are closely related.

The first is about how 'real' the component of a force is. Take a force F in diagram 1. You can componentize it along two perpendicular axes. Now, F\sin{(a)} is a force directed along the vertical axis. If we now componentize THAT force along perpendicular axes, we get F\sin{(a)}\cos{(a)} perpendicular to F.
Why is it that you cannot componentize a force component?

The second is about componentizing velocity. In special relativity, the length of an object moving at a relative speed to you is contracted. Say we have a spaceship moving diagonally, as in diagram 2. If we componentize its velocities, there are components of speed vertically and horizontally. Does this mean that those directions are also contracted?
In fact, since we can choose orthogonal components at any angle, does that mean that the only direction unaffected by length contraction will be the cross-section perpendicular to v?
Presumably if this is right then it also affects time dilation? That would be tricky.
 

Attachments

  • components.png
    components.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 590
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Identity! :smile:
Identity said:
The first is about how 'real' the component of a force is. Take a force F in diagram 1. You can componentize it along two perpendicular axes. Now, F\sin{(a)} is a force directed along the vertical axis. If we now componentize THAT force along perpendicular axes, we get F\sin{(a)}\cos{(a)} perpendicular to F.
Why is it that you cannot componentize a force component?

You can't "componentize" a component on its own, it makes no sense.

You can "componentize" the whole original force in that direction, but you would have to "componentize" both the original components, and add the results. :wink:
In special relativity, the length of an object moving at a relative speed to you is contracted. Say we have a spaceship moving diagonally, as in diagram 2. If we componentize its velocities, there are components of speed vertically and horizontally. Does this mean that those directions are also contracted?
In fact, since we can choose orthogonal components at any angle, does that mean that the only direction unaffected by length contraction will be the cross-section perpendicular to v?

Yes, the only direction completely unaffected by length contraction is perpendicular to v.

It is as if you squashed the whole graph along the v direction.
 
Oh I see, if you add the other component you have F\sin{a}\cos{a} canceling itself out!

The relativity thing is pretty cool too :]

Thanks tiny-tim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K