What's the difference between W = 0.5 P Δ and W = P Δ for external work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonseh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between the equations W = 0.5 P Δ and W = P Δ in the context of external work. The first equation is deemed appropriate for scenarios involving triangular force-displacement graphs, where the area under the curve represents work done, necessitating the 0.5 factor. In contrast, the second equation applies when the pressure (P) remains constant during the displacement (Δ). Participants express confusion over the context of the equations and the author's mathematical approach, suggesting that integrating pressure with respect to displacement is more accurate. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the conditions under which each equation is applicable, particularly in mechanical systems like springs and trusses.
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


both of these notes are in the same chapter . So , they are relevant to each other ... In the first picture, what's the difference between the 2 circled part ? The first one is W = 0.5 P Δ , the second one is W = P Δ..

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



For the second picture , I think we should use W = 0.5 P Δ instead of W = P Δ ..
(For the external work, the author use 1Δ , so 1 = P so , it's clear that the author use W = P Δ and not W = 0.5 P Δ)

I think W = 0.5 P Δ is more appropriate because W = force x displacement , which is also area under the graph ... Since the area under the graph is triangle , so 0.5 is necessary
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • 588.png
    588.png
    13.5 KB · Views: 324
  • 589.png
    589.png
    22.3 KB · Views: 421
Physics news on Phys.org
The author seems very sloppy with his maths. The first two lines should be:
P ∝ ∆
P = k∆

and he should integrate P.d∆ not P1.d∆1

This is analogous to doing work against a spring, so the factor ½ is required and accounts for the area under the line being triangular.

I can't figure out how the equation in your red rectangle is relevant here. (It would apply in the case where P was fixed regardless of ∆.)

Your second image is beyond me.
 
In the first image, I do not understand what it means to say "P1 is located for displacement Δ1".
If it means it is constant over that displacement then it makes sense.

For the second image, there seems to be missing context. It refers to "the" unit load being applied, as though this is continuing from some prior description. Can you supply that background?
 
If this were the result of a machine's translation into English, then I'd say located≡ fixed :smile:
and we already know that a value fixed ≡ constant :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes fonseh
Can I say that for the trusses member, constant force is applied so that the trusses deform ( displacement occur ) ?? So, p (Delta ) is used ??
 
fonseh said:
Can I say that for the trusses member, constant force is applied so that the trusses deform ( displacement occur ) ?? So, p (Delta ) is used ??
If you apply a constant force to, say, a spring that starts off relaxed then you will get a substantial initial acceleration. The KE developed would mean that you would overshoot the equilibrium position.
However, if the situation is that there is already a significant load and we are just applying a small extra load then the force can be largely constant over that deformation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top