What's the superposition principle for group action?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 1K views
Jianbing_Shao
Messages
140
Reaction score
2
A very simple question: if given a vector ##v(t_0)## and two group functions ##G(t)## and ##G'(t)##, here ##t## is the parameter of time, the two group functions act on ##v(t_0)## simultaneously, then we can get a vector field ##v(t)##, then how to get ##v(t)##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me what you mean. Can you be more specific?

ok. for example,if ##G(t)=exp(\theta^1(t)X_1)## is a rotation around ##x^1## axis, and ##G'(t)=exp(\theta^2(t)X_2)## is a rotation around ##x^2## axis,
Now if we only act ##G(t)## on a vector ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^1## axis, we act ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^2## axis,
If we act ##G(t)## and ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)## at the same time, then what vector field shall we get?
 
Jianbing_Shao said:
ok. for example,if ##G(t)=exp(\theta^1(t)X_1)## is a rotation around ##x^1## axis, and ##G'(t)=exp(\theta^2(t)X_2)## is a rotation around ##x^2## axis,
Now if we only act ##G(t)## on a vector ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^1## axis, we act ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^2## axis,
If we act ##G(t)## and ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)## at the same time, then what vector field shall we get?
Again, it is unclear what you mean by ”acting on v at the same time”. I suspect that this is where your confusion lies. There are several things I could imagine this meaning. Which one you are after would depend on what exactly you are trying to do.
 
Orodruin said:
Again, it is unclear what you mean by ”acting on v at the same time”. I suspect that this is where your confusion lies. There are several things I could imagine this meaning. Which one you are after would depend on what exactly you are trying to do.

What I mean is that between time ##t## and ##t+\delta t##, the change of vector only contains two parts: ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^1(t))X_1)\delta t)## and ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^2(t))X_2)\delta t)##.
Do you think ”acting on v at the same time”can have other meaning?
 
Jianbing_Shao said:
What I mean is that between time ##t## and ##t+\delta t##, the change of vector only contains two parts: ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^1(t))X_1)\delta t)## and ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^2(t))X_2)\delta t)##.
Do you think ”acting on v at the same time”can have other meaning?
But how do combine the two parts into one?

In general if I have two operators A and B, combining them could mean AB or BA or A+B or something else.

Are you, perhaps, referring to the Lie product formula or the related Trotter product formula?
 
DrGreg said:
But how do combine the two parts into one?

In general if I have two operators A and B, combining them could mean AB or BA or A+B or something else.

Are you, perhaps, referring to the Lie product formula or the related Trotter product formula?

In my opinion. perhaps Lie product formula is also not valid here, I think we can use differential equations here,
to the example mentioned above, we can describe ##v(t)## in such a way:
$$\partial_t v(t)=v(t)(\partial_t\theta^1(t)X_1+\partial_t\theta^2(t)X_2)$$
Then we can get ##v(t)## in the formula of time-ordered product:
$$v(t)=v(t_0)T\{exp\int(\partial_t\theta^1(t)X_1+\partial_t\theta^2(t)X_2)dt\}$$
This formula can guarantee that the local change of vector field only contains two Infinitesimal rotations。
 
Last edited: