Wheatstone Bridge Strain Gauge Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the operation and interpretation of a Wheatstone Bridge (WB) strain gauge setup used in a bending lab experiment. Participants explore the implications of strain measurements obtained from a Half-Bridge configuration, particularly focusing on the unexpected negative strain reading despite both gauges being in tension.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Casey describes a bending lab experiment using a Wheatstone Bridge strain gauge and expresses confusion over obtaining a negative strain measurement when both gauges are in tension.
  • One participant suggests checking the resistance to strain formula, indicating that reversing the original and strained resistance in the formula could lead to a negative result.
  • Another participant clarifies that the half bridge measures the voltage difference between two points and explains the configuration of known and unknown resistors in the Wheatstone Bridge setup.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the negative strain measurement. There are differing views on the understanding of the measurement process and the implications of the half-bridge configuration.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific measurements being taken and the implications of the half-bridge configuration. There is also a lack of clarity on the resistance to strain formula and its application in this context.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I recently did a bending lab with a WB Strain Gauge in a bunch of different configurations.

One measurement in particular is bothering me. Referring to the figure below, there are four strain gauges, Yellow, Orange, Black and Red mounted to a cantilevered beam with an applied loading 'P.'

I had the data acquisition system output a measurement for a Half-Bridge configuration in which R1 = RYellow and R2 = ROrange

We can see from the figure that both of the gauges are in tension. So why is the strain measurement that I got negative? It is effectively taking the strain measured from the yellow gauge and subtracting it from the strain ,measured from the orange gauge. Why does it do that? What exactly is this quantifying?
bridge.jpg


Thanks,
Casey

Also: I thought maybe I screwed this up, but the Lab Assistant had all of the 'approximate expected strains' and mine matched up pretty well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you said your strain "number" is correct and your "sign" is wrong, my first guess is to check your resistance to strain formula.

Classically, this would be (R_strained-R_original)/(R/original*Gage Factor).

Reversing the R_original and R_strained in the numerator would produce the same result, only negative.
 
Harry Hazard said:
Since you said your strain "number" is correct and your "sign" is wrong, my first guess is to check your resistance to strain formula.

Classically, this would be (R_strained-R_original)/(R/original*Gage Factor).

Reversing the R_original and R_strained in the numerator would produce the same result, only negative.

Hey there :smile: Thanks for having a look, but just to clarify:

I never said that my sign was wrong. I just don't understand what is being measured here. Why does the half bridge take one measurement and subtract it from the other? What does that get me?

Thanks!
 
Oops! I misread that. :D

You measure the voltage between two opposite points, let's say "North" and "South" if your bridge has the diamond configuration. And you apply a voltage from "West" to "East". On the South bridge, you have two known resistors. On the North, you have one known resistor and one unknown resistor(the strain gage). You can solve for the unknown resistor using the known resistors and voltages. And at this point, once I get my scanner working, I'll scan in my notes on it. lol
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K