When does the perspective from the cockpit of a spaceship change?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the changing perspectives of a spaceship pilot during the approach and landing on a planet, specifically focusing on the transition from viewing the planet as a spherical object to perceiving it as a flat surface during landing. The conversation touches on concepts of spacecraft orientation, landing techniques, and pilot experiences, blending both real-life and hypothetical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the pilot's perspective changes when they orient the spaceship for landing, aiming towards the surface rather than straight down.
  • Others argue that the initial perspective of approaching a spherical planet is incorrect for landing on a planet with an atmosphere, emphasizing the need for a different approach trajectory.
  • A participant describes the importance of gravity and atmospheric braking during descent, proposing that a spacecraft should ideally approach from the side rather than directly towards the surface.
  • Some contributions highlight the differences in landing techniques between various spacecraft, such as the Apollo spacecraft and SpaceX boosters, noting how their designs influence the pilot's perspective during landing.
  • A later reply questions whether the original inquiry is about real spacecraft operations or a fictional scenario, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the discussion's intent.
  • Participants discuss the feeling of descending vertically versus approaching horizontally, noting how this affects the pilot's perception during landing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct perspective during landing. Multiple competing views remain regarding the appropriate approach and the nature of the pilot's experience.

Contextual Notes

Some statements depend on specific assumptions about spacecraft design and atmospheric conditions. The discussion includes varying interpretations of how different spacecraft operate during landing, which may not be universally applicable.

  • #31
DrStupid said:
But it still couldn't fly for hours.
Right. It seems that something like the shuttle design will have too little lift to keep it up for long but, once it slows up a bit it will fly as a dumpy glider. What you said about the braking effect on the ship is making sense to me. It can only 'fly' a bit better than a capsule during the hypersonic phase.
This has been very interesting, thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K