When exactly is it useful to use (electricity)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elbobo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
Using 1/(4 pi * permittivity of free space) can simplify calculations in electrical force and field formulas, particularly when applying Gauss's law, as it allows for cancellation of factors in many problems. While both this expression and the Coulomb constant k yield similar results, k is often seen as a convenient constant without significant physical meaning. The permittivity of free space is a fundamental constant that also relates to the speed of light, making it more relevant in advanced contexts like Maxwell's equations. In contrast, k may be easier for straightforward calculations involving point charges. Ultimately, the choice between the two forms depends on the specific problem and context.
Elbobo
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
When is it more simple to use 1 / (4 pi * permitivity of free space) versus k, the Coulomb constant in electrical force/ electrical field formulas? My teacher and my textbook say there are times when it simplifies things, but I have yet to find any reasoning behind it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They're the same thing. If you calculate it out, they're both approximately 9x10^9. The 1/(4 pi * permittivity of free space) just comes from gauss' law. Coulomb's law was developed earlier (I believe) and so in place of this, a constant was used, k, and its value experimentally calculated.

Also, without having studied gauss' law it doesn't make much sense to write it in the longer form, after all, it is just a constant.
 
Well that's what I thought too, but again, my teacher and my Giancoli textbook both say there are times when the calculations become simplied, somehow.
 
When using Maxwell's equations, you see permittivity of free space everywhere. There is no use in writing 1/(4 pi k) instead.
 
It seems that k is a constant with little physical significance by itself, but convenient in calculations for its singular value. Permittivity, a physical property, and Gauss's law, representing the geometry of charges, are expressed by the alternative form.
 
Rationalising the constant ie writing it in the form 1/4 pi epsilon makes a lot of calculations a bit simpler because for many problems the 4 pis will cancel out.Also,epsilon is a fundamental constant and it appears in the equation for the speed of light.I can only think of a few examples where the coulomb constant would be easier one of these being when calculating the force between point charges.As nabeshin pointed out they are the same thing so use whatever form you like.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top