When is a Galois group not faithful

[algebrat]

Hi, I'm looking at proposition 1.14(c) of Artin's Algebra.

It says

if we have K a splitting field for polynomial f from F[x], with roots a_1,...,a_n,
then the Galois group G(K/F) acts faithfully on the set of roots.

I look at faithful as the symmetries in the roots completely represent the group.
That is, no root is fixed by any group element (besides the identity (edited)).

When should I worry about this, are there any ways to construct a relevant counterexample if we drop a condition?

(So for actions, transitive and faithful is like surjectivity and injectivity respectively?)

 

[DonAntonio]

Hi, I'm looking at proposition 1.14(c) of Artin's Algebra.

It says

if we have K a splitting field for polynomial f from F[x], with roots a_1,...,a_n,
then the Galois group G(K/F) acts faithfully on the set of roots.

I look at faithful as the symmetries in the roots completely represent the group.
That is, no root is fixed by any group element.

This cannot be correct as any element in K, and also the roots of f, are fixed by the identity automorphism.

The action is faithful if \,\forall 1\neq g\in Gal\left(K/F\right)\,\,\exists \,1\leq i\leq n\,\,s.t.\,\,g(a_i)\neq a_i\, , which of course is true.

DonAntonio

When should I worry about this, are there any ways to construct a relevant counterexample if we drop a condition?

(So for actions, transitive and faithful is like surjectivity and injectivity respectively?)

 

[Hurkyl]

(So for actions, transitive and faithful is like surjectivity and injectivity respectively?)

A transitive action is like a one-element set. More precisely, there is only one orbit.

A faithful action means you have "enough" elements to distinguish group elements -- two group elements are equal if and only if they have the same values.

 

[algebrat]

Yes thank you, I edited it. So I was reading some more and looks like part (c) is less interesting than parts (a) and (b) of prop 1.14, and it appears part (c) is true for nearly all finitely generated extensions, not just splitting fields. But I may not get to this soon, I'm more interested right now in just learning how to apply Galois theory.

 

[algebrat]

Also, I guess I meant I was thinking out loud about mnemonics for remembering transitive and faithful. Once I remember they're like surjectivity and injectivity, but for group actions, I can remember the definitions.

 

[mathwonk]

I have not taught this lately but I seem to recall that faithfulness fails only in characteristic p > 0. and you are right in your definition of faithfulness if you omit the identity element as pointed out above. I.e. to me a faithful action is one where the subgroup fixing all elements consists of just the identity. Indeed if you look in the index of the book you find the definition of a faithful action on lines 12-13 page 183 of Artin.

 

[DonAntonio]

I have not taught this lately but I seem to recall that faithfulness fails only in characteristic p > 0. and you are right in your definition of faithfulness if you omit the identity element as pointed out above. I.e. to me a faithful action is one where the subgroup fixing all elements consists of just the identity. Indeed if you look in the index of the book you find the definition of a faithful action on lines 12-13 page 183 of Artin.

If by "faithful" the OP meant "transitive" then it is easy: The Galois group on a Galois extension is always transitive on the set of roots

of any irreducible polynomial over the base field which has at least one (and thus all) root in the upper field.

 

[mathwonk]

I have never heard of faithful meaning transitive.

 

[DonAntonio]

I have never heard of faithful meaning transitive.

Neither have I.

DonAntonio

 

[mathwonk]

ok, nowicit.