I When is a given state an eigenstate of a given operator?

Kyle.Nemeth
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
How do I know if some given state is and eigenstate of some given operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an extremely broad question. Are you talking about experiments or theory?
 
I am referring to theory. I may have posted this in the wrong category as well, I'm not sure. But I'm trying to prove that some given state is not an eigenstate of some given operator. I'm doing this all in Dirac notation and matrix representation. So, should I start with the eigenvalue equation and show that the given state is not an eigenvector of the operator (Again, I know the operator and the state in matrix form)?
 
Kyle.Nemeth said:
So, should I start with the eigenvalue equation and show that the given state is not an eigenvector of the operator (Again, I know the operator and the state in matrix form)?
Yes, although it may be easier to assume that it is and then derive the result that the eigenvalue is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Kyle.Nemeth
Thank you for the help Nugatory, much appreciated.
 

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'What does the product part of Laughlin wave function mean?'

I am looking at the Laughlin wave function and it contains the term $$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q$$ In Wikipedia the lower index on ##\Pi## is ##1\le i<j\le N## and there is no upper index. I'm not sure what either mean. For example would $$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q=\prod_{k=2}^{N}\left[\prod_{j=1}^{k-1}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q\right]?$$ (It seems that ##k## cannot be 1 because there would be nothing to multiply in the second product). I'm not sure what else the...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Eigenstates of the Klein Gordon Field Operator
Replies
8
Views
379
I Eigenstates of particle with 1/2 spin (qbit)
Replies
24
Views
2K
I Motivation behind the Operator-Formalism in QM
Replies
3
Views
1K
A Asymptotic states in the Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Collapse of wavefunction into a forbidden eigenstate for a free particle
2
Replies
75
Views
5K
A Cat state acting on given Hamiltonian
Replies
1
Views
830
I Tensor products and simultaneous eigenstates
Replies
1
Views
596
I Meaning of eigenvalue of projection operator/projector
Replies
17
Views
1K
I Measurements and uncertainty principle
Replies
12
Views
2K
B Do eigenstate probabilities change with time?
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top