When is arc length ≈ chord length

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between arc length and chord length in a circle, specifically when the approximation of arc length by chord length is valid. The original poster presents a scenario involving a circle of radius R, an arc length SAB, and a chord length AB, and seeks to quantify the conditions under which these two lengths can be considered approximately equal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a relationship between the arc length and chord length using the formulas SAB = R*theta and AB = 2*R*sin(theta/2). They question the conditions under which the approximation SAB ≈ AB holds true, particularly in relation to the ratio SAB/R.
  • Some participants question the implications of relative versus absolute error in the approximation, suggesting that the original poster's condition for a good approximation may depend on both the radius R and the angle theta.
  • There is discussion about the typical assumption that sin(x) is approximately equal to x for small angles, and how this might relate to the original poster's inquiry.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the approximation's validity. Some guidance has been offered regarding the consideration of relative and absolute errors, but no consensus has been reached on the specific conditions for the approximation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the approximation may be valid for angles less than 10 degrees, and there is an emphasis on the importance of understanding the nature of errors in the approximation process.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Maybe this is precalculus? Either way, here is a question that I am curious about. Take a circle of radius R and sweep out an arc length SAB with endpoints 'A' and 'B' over angle theta. For a short enough arc length, I believe that we could approximate SAB by the chord length AB.

I am trying quantify "when" the ratio SAB/R is such that the approximation is a good one. I guess a good start is to establish some relationships. From the picture below, we see that the arc length is given by SAB=R*theta and the chord length is given by AB = 2*R*sin(theta/2).

So I believe we should now ask when does R*theta ≈ 2*R*sin(theta/2).

I know from other problems we often employ the approximation that if an angle 'X' is "small enough", then sin(X)≈X. It looks like this would help here since if we let sin(theta/2) = theta/2, then the approximation above becomes an identity. I am just having trouble figuring out how to relate this all back to the ratio SAB/R ? What if we said that we already know that for some critical value of the angle X we can approximate sin(X) = X. We will call that "known" value Xcr. So if theta/2 < Xcr then SAB≈AB. So
\theta/2 &lt; X_{cr}\Rightarrow \theta &lt; 2*X_{cr} and from the arc length relationship SAB = r*theta we can assert that when S_{AB}/R &lt; 2*X_{cr}, the approximation is good.

Can someone let me know if they think my logic is flawed? I have never done something like this from scratch before :redface:

Thanks!

chord.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your argument looks like a typical reasonable heuristic one.


However, do note that you are paying attention to relative error. If x and sin(x) are "close", then relatively speaking, Rx and Rsin(x) are equally "close".

However, if absolute error matters, your condition on a good approximation will depend on both R and x.
 
Hurkyl said:
However, if absolute error matters, your condition on a good approximation will depend on both R and x.

Hi Hurkyl :smile: I am wondering, isn't this the same as saying that that my condition of a good approximation depends on how close the value of the ratio S/R is to 2*Xcr ? Seeing as the angle is given by S/R.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Generally, we assume sinx~x for x<10degrees. So maybe that would be of some help to you
 
Yes you can ! :)

but it all depends on how accurate you want to be and/or if you don't have an easy alternative.

*basically its a good approximation, you don't need to guess just crunch the numbers and check by how much percent sin(x) and x differ for a range of values.
 
Saladsamurai said:
Hi Hurkyl :smile: I am wondering, isn't this the same as saying that that my condition of a good approximation depends on how close the value of the ratio S/R is to 2*Xcr ?
Nope.

While the value SAB/R tells you everything about the relative error when approximating SAB with AB, it doesn't tell you anything about the absolute error.
 
Hurkyl said:
Nope.

While the value SAB/R tells you everything about the relative error when approximating SAB with AB, it doesn't tell you anything about the absolute error.

OK. So perhaps you are saying that for some fixed R, the choice of X will fix my absolute error? That is, if given the choice between 2 different values of X1 and X2, then the one that makes sin(X) closest to X is the one with the lowest absolute error.

Sorry, I am just trying to get a feel for what you are saying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K